Zandronum Chat on our Discord Server Get the latest version: 3.1
Source Code

View Issue Details Jump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0003899Doomseeker[All Projects] Cleanuppublic2021-08-10 11:052021-12-30 23:34
Assigned ToBlzut3 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version1.3.2 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0003899: Dockerfile uses Ubuntu 16.04 (which we don't support)
Quote from Blzut3
Given that we only really support Ubuntu 18.04+ and similar era distributions at this point (per policy of following Canonical's free support period)

End of Standard Support for 16.04 LTS was April 2021. But our Dockerfile still uses it. 😅
Steps To Reproduce
$ head -n 1 Dockerfile
FROM ubuntu:16.04
Attached Files

- Relationships
parent of 0003965closedWubTheCaptain Ubuntu 16.04 LTS support is missing a deprecation notice 

-  Notes
User avatar (0021717)
WubTheCaptain (reporter)
2021-08-10 11:09

It was still supported at the time of Doomseeker 1.3.1 release, so this affects only 1.3.2 so far.
User avatar (0021718)
Blzut3 (administrator)
2021-08-10 17:38

Just to add my thoughts here: I'm going to leave things be until we have some pain point with GCC 5, CMake 3.5, or Qt 5.5 (that would be solved with GCC 7, CMake 3.10, and Qt 5.9). Given that there was expressed interest to go to C++17 in 0003806 I can't imagine it will be long (and to be clear I have no objections to doing so), but that of course depends on how much time we have to work on this. Right now my goal is to get Doomseeker able to compile against Qt 6.
User avatar (0022036)
WubTheCaptain (reporter)
2021-12-28 12:34

Needs target version.
User avatar (0022045)
Blzut3 (administrator)
2021-12-29 04:34

Nothing changed on my opinion here. It doesn't hurt to know that Doomseeker still compiles on 16.04's software versions, but there shouldn't be any hesitation to change the docker image if it breaks in a way that would be solved by bumping to 18.04. I'm not sure how one would assign a target version to that?
User avatar (0022046)
WubTheCaptain (reporter)
2021-12-29 08:22

I'm not sure how to track this effectively on the tracker either. Though now that I do think of it, I wonder if the Dockerfile can be – or should be – hosted in a seperate Git repository.
User avatar (0022065)
Blzut3 (administrator)
2021-12-30 22:18

I don't see any benefit to putting it in a different repo.

My proposal is to just close this ticket, it will take care of itself when the time inevitably comes.

Issue Community Support
This issue is already marked as resolved.
If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why.
Supporters: No one explicitly supports this issue yet.
Opponents: No one explicitly opposes this issue yet.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2021-08-10 11:05 WubTheCaptain New Issue
2021-08-10 11:09 WubTheCaptain Note Added: 0021717
2021-08-10 11:18 WubTheCaptain Category Bug => Cleanup
2021-08-10 17:38 Blzut3 Note Added: 0021718
2021-08-11 04:06 WubTheCaptain Status new => resolved
2021-08-11 04:06 WubTheCaptain Resolution open => suspended
2021-08-11 04:06 WubTheCaptain Assigned To => Blzut3
2021-12-28 12:33 WubTheCaptain Status resolved => new
2021-12-28 12:33 WubTheCaptain Status new => assigned
2021-12-28 12:33 WubTheCaptain Resolution suspended => open
2021-12-28 12:33 WubTheCaptain Status assigned => new
2021-12-28 12:34 WubTheCaptain Note Added: 0022036
2021-12-29 04:34 Blzut3 Note Added: 0022045
2021-12-29 08:22 WubTheCaptain Note Added: 0022046
2021-12-29 08:23 WubTheCaptain Status new => confirmed
2021-12-29 08:23 WubTheCaptain Resolution open => suspended
2021-12-30 11:51 WubTheCaptain Relationship added parent of 0003965
2021-12-30 22:18 Blzut3 Note Added: 0022065
2021-12-30 23:34 WubTheCaptain Status confirmed => resolved

Questions or other issues? Contact Us.


Copyright © 2000 - 2023 MantisBT Team
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker