Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2025-06-14 14:37 UTC | ![]() |
My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Doomseeker Issue Support Ranking | Rules | My Account |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0003512 | Doomseeker | IP2C | public | 2018-09-22 23:20 | 2018-12-17 03:34 | ||||
Reporter | WubTheCaptain | ||||||||
Assigned To | Zalewa | ||||||||
Priority | high | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always | ||||
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | 1.1 | ||||||||
Target Version | 1.2 | Fixed in Version | 1.2 | ||||||
Summary | 0003512: MaxMind GeoLite2: Update from CC BY-SA 3.0 licensed dataset to newer CC BY-SA 4.0 licensed work | ||||||||
Description | The about dialog in Doomseeker says MaxMind GeoLite2 is included and under CC BY-SA 3.0 license. This is no longer true today, if updated stuff is shipped? Also, CC BY-SA 3.0 would be incompatible with all other licenses. CC BY-SA 4.0 allows distributing the combined work (binaries with inclusion of GeoLite2) under terms of GPLv3-only. | ||||||||
Steps To Reproduce |
Quote[^]' | ||||||||
Additional Information | 0003237. media/SOURCES.txt says CC BY-SA 4.0 properly. | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|
Pol M (developer) 2018-09-24 22:07 |
pull request good night :) |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-24 22:13 |
Question: What's the licensing of the one included with the distribution? (Not those remotely downloaded.) |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-24 23:42 |
Additionally, tools/geolite2_conv.py copyright notice is in question. (2016, CC BY-SA 3.0 mentioned there.) Additionally, the "about dialog" (and its translations) still says (c) 2016 for the data. Is this correct? |
Pol M (developer) 2018-09-25 15:26 edited on: 2018-09-25 15:28 |
Quote from Wub Quote from About dialog Yep, It does say so. Quote from Wub (I'm not sure if I understood you) If you are referring to the file "media/IpToCountry.dat", It seems to be licenced under CC BY-SA 4.0, as you already stated. Unfortunately, I'm not sure, due to the file being added the 2016β05β14 with commit f78933a and at the time being licenced under CC BY-SA 3.0. The file has not changed ever since. If we have problems with the file, I think it could be updated. (2 years is a lot of time :)) (If you weren't referring to that, sorry) |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-25 18:06 |
I was referring to media/IpToCountry.dat indeed, it's downloaded and created with tools/geolite2_conv.py. |
Pol M (developer) 2018-09-25 18:13 |
Quote from Linda Ok, then I'll generate a new IpToCountry.dat, just in case you think that it needs to be updated. |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-09-25 20:50 |
Quote from Pol From what I understand this ticket describes this approach as impossible because it would be illegal. I'm not sure what's the "definition of done" for this ticket. |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-25 23:42 |
Quote from Zalewa How so? Let's disregard IP2C autoupdates for a moment. I'll make some interpretations and perhaps some assumptions, no warranties of what I speak of is correct. Consider Doomseeker 1.1 is released under GPLv2. Consider Doomseeker 1.1 uses CC BY-SA 3.0'd GeoLite2. Consider CC BY-SA 3.0 is not compatible with GPLv2 or GPLv3. Binaries of Doomseeker 1.1 with GeoLite2 in it (linked) could be "illegal" to distribute, for plausibility of violating the copyright of both parties. (Fyi, 1.1 has not been relicensed to LGPLv2.1+ or granted any special linking exemption with MaxMind's database under GPLv2.) Now, consider: Doomseeker 1.2 is released under LGPLv2.1+. MaxMind has licensed newer versions of GeoLite2 under CC BY-SA 4.0. One-way compatibility exists from CC BY-SA 4.0 to GPLv3, that is, CC BY-SA 4.0 works can be incorporated to GPLv3'd works but GPLv3'd works cannot be incorporated into CC BY-SA 4.0 works. A compatibility chart between different versions of GNU licenses is available on GNU website:'https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#AllCompatibility [^]' β that is, "LGPLv2.1 gives you permission to relicense the code under any version of the GPL since GPLv2". Distributing Doomseeker 1.2 under terms of GPLv2+ seems fine. A resulting adaptation of GeoLite2 (CC BY-SA 4.0) in Doomseeker (media/IpToCountry.dat) authored with tools/geolite2_conv.py would be licensable under GPLv3-only. As GPLv3 license text also clarifies in section 5, a compilation of a work is called an "aggregate" and not a combined larger work. Or in other words, multiple incompatibly licensed works can reside on an aggregate medium like a filesystem or a CD without interference from GPLv3. "Inclusion of a covered work in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other parts of the aggregate." Doomseeker 1.2 source code may be legally conveyed under terms of LGPLv2.1+, resulting larger work binaries with GeoLite2 under GPLv3-only, and GeoLite2 under CC BY-SA 4.0 and GPLv3. I say go ahead with updating media/IpToCountry.dat, as long as MaxMind's copyright notices are updated to reflect the license change to CC BY-SA 4.0. |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-25 23:55 |
Quote from Zalewa I figured this ticket gets stretched a bit beyond the summary. For clarification, it is:
Quote from MaxMind[^]' |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-26 00:05 |
Quote from WubTheCaptain Just in case, I'll also clarify the point of view from LGPLv2.1: Quote from GNU Lesser General Public License, version 2.1 |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-26 01:25 edited on: 2018-09-26 01:27 |
Quote from WubTheCaptainQuote from Zalewa Additionally, I think the preferred form for making modifications to MaxMind's GeoLite2 Country database is the CSV version (the one tools/geolite2_conv.py processes), not the MMDB binary. Required to satisfy GPLv3's source requirement. Distribute the CSV version alongside IpToCountry.dat in the source tree, too. |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-26 01:42 |
Lastly (?), don't forget to indicate you made changes to the CC BY-SA'd work (converted it to a format Doomseeker understands, if that's applicable [exemptions exist for interoperability in Finnish copyright law at least, I believe]). (CC BY-SA 4.0, section 3, article (a)(1)(B).) I know, this ticket is messy and could use the help of some child tickets. π |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-26 01:47 edited on: 2018-09-26 01:49 |
Updated issue summary to reflect the actual work needed to be done here. |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-09-26 05:42 edited on: 2018-09-26 05:42 |
Quote from "Zalewa" This comment still stands then as we want to release Doomseeker under LGPLv2.1, not GPLv3. However, it seems the matter is as simple as removing the IpToCountry.dat database from the executable (resources.qrc) and putting it into /usr/share/doomseeker or Doomseeker dir on Windows. |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-26 12:08 |
Quote from WubTheCaptain I wasn't aware of CC BY-SA 4.0 section 2, article (a)(4). Quote from Zalewa I'm more dubious of practicability (especially for redistributors) of this, and not convinced due to lack of more detailed interpretation of the two licenses from you. The software still links with IpToCountry.dat (CC BY-SA 4.0). LGPLv2.1+ seemingly allows this (weak copyleft), but how can the CC BY-SA 4.0 license's copyleft be respected in such scenario for binaries? My answer: It cannot be. (I was initially going to say "Probably cannot be [under LGPLv2.1], but maybe under LGPLv3 leastmost could be respected.", but I later found out that's not true.) Seems trivial to change something from static to dynamic linking if redistributors (NB: not you, The Doomseeker Team) still have to doubt about CC BY-SA 4.0 compliance under something else but GPLv3 or via Creative Commons proxy. It does still have some apparent benefits for redistributors, so I support the idea. All the better for me (us) if GeoLite2 will be completely optional in use, so that any permanent license termination of CC BY-SA 4.0 does not make using Doomseeker with GeoLite2 useless or illegal too in such scenario beyond exceptions and limitations. -- And now, the boring detail because I always ought to reason my views (how correct or incorrect ever those may be). I'm afraid it will most often just make me look worse or my opinions get easily dismissed for other reasons (such as in issue 0003510), because I feel like being the one-sided party arguing in this while not receiving arguments and interpretations back in detail. π I don't want that to happen... Not the least someone would be asking the right questions for clarification, so I will try to explain almost everything at risk it will make me look worse and less comprehensible. The benefit of dynamic linking (above) is that Doomseeker binary may (?) become distributable solely under LGPLv2.1+, if it can work without the BY-SA database (e.g., displaying "?" country flags for every server). I say "may", because [insert my incomprehensible question the "corresponding source", removed at last minute]. This may not immediately concern the supplier (Zalewa / Blzut3 at DRDTeam), but does arguably concern redistributors who do not want to infringe the copyrights in Doomseeker (its authors). There's no other benefit in Zalewa's proposal of dynamic linking / seperating the database from the Doomseeker binary. The other part to solve is the copyleft provision of BY-SA 4.0's effect in Doomseeker, and respect that license. I'm feeling quiet confident to claim the distribution of static linked Doomseeker binary with GeoLite2 (NB: excluding Doomseeker source code distribution from the claim) under terms of anything but GPLv3-only is unauthorized by the copyright holders (MaxMind), and leads to termination of the CC BY-SA license. (Hey, I believe to have started the 30-day BY-SA 4.0 license termination clock just now or slightly earlier! Oops, BY-SA 3.0 already terminated a long ago for DRDTeam. π) "Share" in CC BY-SA 4.0 includes definition of communication, and an "adapted material" [sic] (from here on referred as "adapted work") includes, but is not limited to, "arranging" and "transforming" the works. It is my broad interpretation static or dynamic linking the two pieces fits these definitions. I'm thinking like collages (Commons:Collages), but in this case with software. The comparison to collages seems especially true with static linking. The "contents" of IpToCountry.dat is not original work of Doomseeker developers; that's almost exclusively under MaxMind's copyright, despite the format change. CC BY-SA 4.0 prohibits additional terms which restrict rights to that license. Far fetched, there's incompatibilities: LGPLv2.1 does not reinstate the license automatically and terminates immediately, unlike LGPLv3, GPLv3 and CC BY-SA 4.0. (It's far fetched, because changing from MMDB / CVS format to Doomseeker format doesn't seem to be an adaptation under CC BY-SA 4.0 section 2, article (a)(4); thus, there would be no adapter's license grant to terminate to that adapted work and the original BY-SA'd work. But I believe arranging and transforming (= linking) the two works together is an adaptation, so this plays a role.) Assuming we have an adapted CC BY-SA 4.0 section 3, is LGPLv3 fine then? No... because article (b)(1) essentially says it needs to CC BY-SA 4.0 or later version, or a "BY-SA Compatible License", where the latter's explicit definition requires it to be "approved by Creative Commons as essentially the equivalent of this Public License" at the URL mentioned; and LGPLv3 is not on that list. I emphasize: The BY-SA compatibility is a required condition of the license. Even though personally I think LGPLv3 (NB: not LGPLv2.1) makes sense with BY-SA 4.0 (NB: not BY-SA 3.0) compatibility in almost every way, the BY-SA 4.0 license does not allow to redistribute any adapted work of LGPLv2.1+/GPLv2+ and BY-SA 4.0 under anything but GPLv3-only + BY-SA 4.0; because Creative Commons (assumably) didn't review the LGPLv3 license for compatibility, and it is not recognized as "BY-SA compatible" by them. π© Honestly, I stopped reviewing differences between the two licenses after this was so explicit in BY-SA 4.0. If I didn't conclude something yet here, it's that Doomseeker binaries with GeoLite2 could be built with a GPLv3 configure flag (CMake, `-DENABLE_GPL`) at compile time. Else it could build without GeoLite2 and distribute under LGPLv2.1+. Neither is really an issue for a motivated redistributor, and not a concern for the source code supplier due to aggregation. Hopefully my three hours of personal time saved in this note can save some costs on any questions to lawyers per hour. If the situation doesn't satisfy Zalewa, please take it to Creative Commons for compatibility review (if you will agree to at least LGPLv3+), remove GeoLite2 from LGPLv2.1+ distributions (CMake flag) or seek permission from MaxMind to have them relicense GeoLite2 under CC BY-4.0 (or similar compatible license without the conflicting copyleft). |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-26 13:00 |
I got few trivial words wrong (copyright & license, "is authorized" vs "would be unauthorized" or "would be in violation") but the point stays. And for clarification, I must refer to GPLv3 text what creates an "aggregate" not an "adaptation" (because it was written by lawyers), to conclusively link the two things together: Quote from GNU General Public License, version 3 I claim linking creates an extension to the LGPLv2.1+'d work. |
Blzut3 (administrator) 2018-09-27 01:11 |
While I don't disagree with your interpretation of BY-SA, I think that Zalewa's proposal to move it out the binary would indeed work. If you were to take that database and import it into a Microsoft SQL database (MS SQL being the first thing that comes to mind when I think proprietary database software but take your pick), would I be violating the license? To that end I don't think Doomseeker reading the work is equivalent to linking, although this has made me think about just how arbitrary the line is between dynamically linking code and reading a file. With that said, if I may direct you to'https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/ShareAlike_compatibility:_GPLv3#Considerations_for_adapters_applying_the_GPLv3 [^]' Quote With a separate file I don't think there's any doubt at all here so per this quote I don't believe the use of CC-BY-SA data has any implications of the licensing of the program. I'm not even certain that having the files separated is a requirement although it might not be a bad idea to be on the safe side. Quote from WubTheCaptain Please understand that while we disagree on a lot of things I very much appreciate your point of view. |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-27 02:10 edited on: 2018-09-27 02:11 |
Quote from Blzut3 I'll be short to answer this theoretical question:
|
Pol M (developer) 2018-09-28 20:36 |
Is there a consensus? π |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-09-29 11:32 |
Can this be it?
|
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-09-29 13:28 |
Quote from Zalewa Needed by Debian, reproducibility and all. Copyright wise perhaps needed by GPLv3-only distribution (if this is how binaries will have to be distributed, source required), not in itself needed by LGPLv2.1+. Additionally, it's disallowed for Debian packages to download something from the Internet in mid of build process. So yes, it's required for Debian (or else the Debian maintainer has to patch it in). The rest of the proposal sounds fine, although a little complicated. Quote from Zalewa Will be DFSG-removed from the Debian package and generated from source (point #1), but I don't think this is your concern. Quote from Zalewa Reminding again that irregardless of outcome, Doomseeker's source code remains LGPLv2.1+'d βΒ even if binaries built from LGPLv2.1+ code had to be distributed under terms of GPLv3-only. Beyond that, distributors, e.g. DRD Team, may still have to comply with Qt5's LGPLv3 source offer requirement for Qt5 source because of linking β this is not done yet. Qt4 shrug. |
Blzut3 (administrator) 2018-09-30 01:50 |
If we're not baking it into the executable, do we actually benefit from having the database in the repo? The alternative is to download/convert it in our release scripts (to be clear for WubTheCaptain: not build time). I can't personally think of any real advantage to including the database in the repo especially given that even without a default Doomseeker can still download and use an updated database at runtime. I suspect Debian would opt to not distribute a database at all given the closed ticket 0003235. But if they did want to distribute the database they could provide the database themselves and run the Python script during packaging. Just throwing this out there since typically one want to avoid binary files in the repo a while before it made sense since it was compiled in, I'm not sure it makes sense in the separate file model. |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-09-30 07:12 |
One thing to keep in mind here is that running the conversion script isn't costless when you're time-constrained. I made it use all CPU cores and split the jobs evenly, but even then
|
Blzut3 (administrator) 2018-10-01 04:58 |
Not anymore:'https://bitbucket.org/Doomseeker/doomseeker/commits/536f21e02e30fb552fcdb8e832b400064bc56fb9 [^]' (As I teased in an email to you last night.) |
Pol M (developer) 2018-10-01 17:05 edited on: 2018-10-01 17:09 |
OK, let's see if I can make something out of this:
Quote from Blzut3 So, maybe we shall not add 13MB in the repo? Affected by the 1st point, so only make a new media/IpToCountry.dat with new CC BY-SA 4.0? Quote from Wub So not really necessary to satisfy the ticket? I'm trying to get the ideas clear, this ticket turned out to be a lot more complex than expectedπ€. I'm getting quite confused, and it is not helping the fever I'm dealing with ππ |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-10-01 17:31 edited on: 2018-10-01 17:34 |
Quote from Pol M We package the program for Windows, for Ubuntu and for Mac OS, so it is necessary. We must be able to prepare a correct installation package because we do prepare installation packages for all those systems. See our download page:'http://doomseeker.drdteam.org/download.php# [^]' If you're unsure how to do this, seek out install() statements in CMakeLists.txt. If you don't wish to muddle with Windows stuff, leave it to me - I'll take care of it. Quote from Pol M This is necessary because that's how Doomseeker works right now - the only difference is that the "preinstalled" database is not placed on the filesystem but baked directly into "doomseeker" binary ("doomseeker.exe" on Windows). In addition, there's also a secondary mechanism that will read this database from disk if it's placed in a specific location. Doomseeker will prefer to do this over reading the one that's baked in, in hope that this disk-database is more up-to-date than the baked in. Thanks to this, we can issue updates of the database that people use without releasing new version of Doomseeker. If you open the IP2C update box from the menu "File | Update IP2C" it will tell you where the downloaded database is. |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-10-01 17:33 |
Quote from Blzut3[^]' The best commit of 2018. π Any benchmarks? Quote from Zalewa I don't see an issue (yet) for package maintainers either way. π€· Quote from Zalewa IpToCountry.dat is a binary format, not the preferred form for modifications. The 13 MB CSV lump is for that. If it's seperate from the binary and loaded at runtime: Dunno. If it's built-in to resources.qrc: GPLv3 almost certainly, source (CSV file) required in source code tarball release. Quote from Zalewa Ditto. |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-10-01 17:36 edited on: 2018-10-01 17:39 |
Wub, you're actually quoting Pol here :)Quote from WubTheCaptain New version:
Thanks, Blzut! That's really awesome. |
Pol M (developer) 2018-10-01 18:47 |
Quote from Zalewa I cannot access Windows computers that easily. I'll leave this ticket. |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-10-04 21:42 |
I'll be taking care of this ticket next. |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-10-06 11:14 edited on: 2018-10-06 11:54 |
(note split to 0003537:0019934) Now, onto sourcing of the database. (note split to 0003538) I'll let this linger for a moment before taking further action. |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-10-06 11:55 |
Zalewa: There's multiple unrelated issues. I've split your note to issues 0003537 and 0003538. |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-10-06 12:51 edited on: 2018-10-06 12:54 |
To resolve this ticket:
The rest is irrelevant to this ticket; see the other related issue tickets. Can we agree to this resolution? |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-10-06 12:53 |
Quote from WubTheCaptain[^]' Actually this may be possibly irrelevant to IpToCountry.dat and this ticket, but relevant to 0003538 (we don't use latitude/longitude in IpToCountry.dat). |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-10-06 17:45 edited on: 2018-10-06 17:45 |
Progress on this will continue as stated in comment 0003512:0019942. |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-10-07 06:16 |
One last thing that concerns me: With this commit the database has become an optional component. However, the "This program uses GeoLite2 database..." remains in the About dialog regardless if the database is loaded or not. Furthermore, there's an unrealistic but still possible chance of someone using some other data source to build IpToCountry.dat, which would make this statement even more false. Should the statement be removed from the dialog if there's no database loaded? |
Blzut3 (administrator) 2018-10-07 06:39 |
While I'm curious on Wub's opinion on the subject, I would say that trying to make the about dialog perfectly accurate is basically impossible. For example Qt5 versions of Doomseeker are technically LGPLv3 or GPLv3 since it's impossible to distribute the combined work otherwise. Similarly Qt4 builds would be LGPLv2.1 or LGPLv3 (not "or later"). And of course this all changes if someone paid for the commercial license for Qt where suddenly the Qt5 version can probably be LGPLv2.1 again. And as you say technically some one could replace the third party files with ones from wherever which has more implications on the license text. So in my opinion I'd rather just leave it there and overstate. |
Zalewa (developer) 2018-10-07 09:30 |
As IP2C stuff was moved to the blobs repository, so was the documentation. Relevant statements were updated in this commit:'https://bitbucket.org/Doomseeker/doomseeker-blobs/commits/0720ceb57706e883d2e6627cba8eebe5cd26b5aa [^]' I think the whole repository can now be inspected for any remaining issues. From Doomseeker's perspective all that was left was the statement in the About dialog, which should be covered here:'https://bitbucket.org/Doomseeker/doomseeker/commits/ee388847d67dcc4b7c59484e51807a79f0ad2b4c [^]' |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2018-10-07 10:49 edited on: 2018-10-07 10:49 |
Quote from Zalewa New issue 0003543. I think this issue ticket is resolved as soon as I take a look at 0003538. |
This issue is already marked as resolved. If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why. |
|
Supporters: | No one explicitly supports this issue yet. |
Opponents: | No one explicitly opposes this issue yet. |
![]() |
|||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2018-09-22 23:20 | WubTheCaptain | New Issue | |
2018-09-22 23:20 | WubTheCaptain | Steps to Reproduce Updated | View Revisions |
2018-09-22 23:21 | WubTheCaptain | Relationship added | child of 0003237 |
2018-09-22 23:48 | WubTheCaptain | Priority | normal => high |
2018-09-24 01:19 | Blzut3 | Target Version | => 1.2 |
2018-09-24 21:52 | Pol M | Assigned To | => Pol M |
2018-09-24 21:52 | Pol M | Status | new => assigned |
2018-09-24 22:07 | Pol M | Note Added: 0019721 | |
2018-09-24 22:13 | WubTheCaptain | Status | assigned => needs review |
2018-09-24 22:13 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019722 | |
2018-09-24 23:42 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019729 | |
2018-09-25 15:26 | Pol M | Note Added: 0019754 | |
2018-09-25 15:27 | Pol M | Note Edited: 0019754 | View Revisions |
2018-09-25 15:28 | Pol M | Note Edited: 0019754 | View Revisions |
2018-09-25 18:06 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019758 | |
2018-09-25 18:13 | Pol M | Note Added: 0019759 | |
2018-09-25 20:50 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019764 | |
2018-09-25 23:42 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019768 | |
2018-09-25 23:46 | WubTheCaptain | Status | needs review => assigned |
2018-09-25 23:55 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019769 | |
2018-09-26 00:05 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019770 | |
2018-09-26 01:25 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019774 | |
2018-09-26 01:27 | WubTheCaptain | Note Edited: 0019774 | View Revisions |
2018-09-26 01:42 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019775 | |
2018-09-26 01:46 | WubTheCaptain | Category | Bug => Suggestion |
2018-09-26 01:46 | WubTheCaptain | Summary | MaxMind GeoLite2: Outdated CC BY-SA 3.0 license statement in "About Doomseeker" dialog => MaxMind GeoLite2: Update from CC BY-SA 3.0 licensed dataset to newer CC BY-SA 4.0 licensed work |
2018-09-26 01:47 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019776 | |
2018-09-26 01:49 | WubTheCaptain | Note Edited: 0019776 | View Revisions |
2018-09-26 05:42 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019779 | |
2018-09-26 05:42 | Zalewa | Note Edited: 0019779 | View Revisions |
2018-09-26 12:08 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019780 | |
2018-09-26 13:00 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019781 | |
2018-09-27 01:11 | Blzut3 | Note Added: 0019782 | |
2018-09-27 02:10 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019784 | |
2018-09-27 02:11 | WubTheCaptain | Note Edited: 0019784 | View Revisions |
2018-09-28 20:36 | Pol M | Note Added: 0019798 | |
2018-09-29 11:32 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019815 | |
2018-09-29 13:28 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019818 | |
2018-09-30 01:50 | Blzut3 | Note Added: 0019834 | |
2018-09-30 07:12 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019838 | |
2018-10-01 04:58 | Blzut3 | Note Added: 0019854 | |
2018-10-01 17:05 | Pol M | Note Added: 0019862 | |
2018-10-01 17:09 | Pol M | Note Edited: 0019862 | View Revisions |
2018-10-01 17:31 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019866 | |
2018-10-01 17:33 | Zalewa | Note Edited: 0019866 | View Revisions |
2018-10-01 17:33 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019867 | |
2018-10-01 17:34 | Zalewa | Note Edited: 0019866 | View Revisions |
2018-10-01 17:36 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019868 | |
2018-10-01 17:39 | Zalewa | Note Edited: 0019868 | View Revisions |
2018-10-01 18:47 | Pol M | Note Added: 0019876 | |
2018-10-01 18:49 | Pol M | Assigned To | Pol M => |
2018-10-01 18:51 | Pol M | Status | assigned => confirmed |
2018-10-04 21:42 | Zalewa | Assigned To | => Zalewa |
2018-10-04 21:42 | Zalewa | Status | confirmed => assigned |
2018-10-04 21:42 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019909 | |
2018-10-06 11:14 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019932 | |
2018-10-06 11:15 | Zalewa | Note Edited: 0019932 | View Revisions |
2018-10-06 11:16 | Zalewa | Note Edited: 0019932 | View Revisions |
2018-10-06 11:20 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019933 | |
2018-10-06 11:26 | WubTheCaptain | Note View State: 0019932: private | |
2018-10-06 11:28 | WubTheCaptain | Relationship added | related to 0003537 |
2018-10-06 11:31 | WubTheCaptain | Note Edited: 0019932 | View Revisions |
2018-10-06 11:31 | WubTheCaptain | Note View State: 0019932: public | |
2018-10-06 11:31 | WubTheCaptain | Note Deleted: 0019933 | |
2018-10-06 11:50 | WubTheCaptain | Relationship added | related to 0003538 |
2018-10-06 11:54 | WubTheCaptain | Note Edited: 0019932 | View Revisions |
2018-10-06 11:55 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019938 | |
2018-10-06 12:01 | WubTheCaptain | Relationship deleted | related to 0003538 |
2018-10-06 12:37 | WubTheCaptain | Relationship added | parent of 0003538 |
2018-10-06 12:38 | WubTheCaptain | Relationship replaced | related to 0003538 |
2018-10-06 12:42 | WubTheCaptain | Relationship replaced | parent of 0003538 |
2018-10-06 12:51 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019942 | |
2018-10-06 12:51 | WubTheCaptain | Status | assigned => feedback |
2018-10-06 12:53 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019943 | |
2018-10-06 12:53 | WubTheCaptain | Status | feedback => assigned |
2018-10-06 12:54 | WubTheCaptain | Status | assigned => feedback |
2018-10-06 12:54 | WubTheCaptain | Note Edited: 0019942 | View Revisions |
2018-10-06 12:56 | WubTheCaptain | Note View State: 0019774: private | |
2018-10-06 12:57 | WubTheCaptain | Note View State: 0019774: public | |
2018-10-06 17:45 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019958 | |
2018-10-06 17:45 | Zalewa | Status | feedback => assigned |
2018-10-06 17:45 | Zalewa | Note Edited: 0019958 | View Revisions |
2018-10-06 17:45 | Zalewa | Note Edited: 0019958 | View Revisions |
2018-10-07 06:16 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019976 | |
2018-10-07 06:39 | Blzut3 | Note Added: 0019977 | |
2018-10-07 09:30 | Zalewa | Note Added: 0019984 | |
2018-10-07 09:30 | Zalewa | Status | assigned => needs review |
2018-10-07 10:47 | WubTheCaptain | Relationship added | related to 0003543 |
2018-10-07 10:49 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0019991 | |
2018-10-07 10:49 | WubTheCaptain | Note Edited: 0019991 | View Revisions |
2018-10-07 11:05 | WubTheCaptain | Relationship replaced | parent of 0003543 |
2018-10-07 11:14 | WubTheCaptain | Status | needs review => resolved |
2018-10-07 11:14 | WubTheCaptain | Fixed in Version | => 1.2 |
2018-10-07 11:14 | WubTheCaptain | Resolution | open => fixed |
2018-10-27 22:54 | WubTheCaptain | Status | resolved => closed |
2018-12-17 03:34 | WubTheCaptain | Category | Suggestion => IP2C |
Copyright © 2000 - 2025 MantisBT Team |