Zandronum Chat on our Discord Server Get the latest version: 3.2
Source Code
My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Site Issue Support Ranking | Rules | My Account
  

View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0000940Site[All Projects] Suggestionpublic2012-07-29 12:502018-11-25 23:02
ReporterTorr Samaho 
Assigned ToBlzut3 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
StatusclosedResolutionfixed 
PlatformOSOS Version
Summary0000940: New status "waiting for ZDoom" and or "will be backported from ZDoom later"
DescriptionThere are a lot of tickets where we either wait for ZDoom to take care of it or where ZDoom already took care of it, but we can't backport the changes yet. Would be very useful to have a status (or two different ones) for this.
Attached Files

- Relationships

-  Notes
User avatar (0004141)
Blzut3 (administrator)
2012-07-30 01:34

 Personally, I think this would clutter up the statuses more than is needed (we're running out of colors :P).

One suggestion I have is that a 2.0 version can be added. If our version bumps correspond to ZDoom upgrades then you can just set the status to acknowledged and "target version" to 2.0. This way the tickets would even appear on the road map.

Another option would be to have it as a custom resolution. Again you would just leave the ticket as acknowledged, but with the resolution of "Backport Later"/"Wait for ZDoom".
User avatar (0004143)
Torr Samaho (administrator)
2012-07-30 05:26

 You can set a resolution for something that is just acknowledged? This would work too, but after a quick look I didn't find out how to do this.
User avatar (0004144)
Blzut3 (administrator)
2012-07-30 05:37

 Well for demonstration purposes then. :P

I used the edit button.
User avatar (0004146)
Blzut3 (administrator)
2012-07-30 09:49

 Added "waiting for zdoom" as a resolution.
User avatar (0004147)
Torr Samaho (administrator)
2012-07-30 17:40
Quote from Blzut3
I used the edit button.

Sounds like somewhat abusing the system, but this should work. Since you added "waiting for zdoom", but not "Backport Later" do you propose that we use "waiting for zdoom" independently of whether we are actually waiting for ZDoom to do something or ZDoom already did something but we just don't want to backport it yet?
User avatar (0004149)
Blzut3 (administrator)
2012-07-30 20:54

 It wasn't clear if you actually wanted two separate items. Anyways, added "backport later."
User avatar (0004165)
Torr Samaho (administrator)
2012-07-31 19:11

 Thanks!

Issue Community Support
This issue is already marked as resolved.
If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why.
Supporters: No one explicitly supports this issue yet.
Opponents: No one explicitly opposes this issue yet.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2012-07-29 12:50 Torr Samaho New Issue
2012-07-29 12:50 Torr Samaho Assigned To => Torr Samaho
2012-07-29 12:50 Torr Samaho Status new => assigned
2012-07-29 12:51 Torr Samaho Assigned To Torr Samaho => Blzut3
2012-07-30 01:34 Blzut3 Note Added: 0004141
2012-07-30 05:26 Torr Samaho Note Added: 0004143
2012-07-30 05:37 Blzut3 Status assigned => acknowledged
2012-07-30 05:37 Blzut3 Resolution open => fixed
2012-07-30 05:37 Blzut3 Note Added: 0004144
2012-07-30 09:48 Blzut3 Resolution fixed => waiting for zdoom
2012-07-30 09:49 Blzut3 Note Added: 0004146
2012-07-30 09:49 Blzut3 Status acknowledged => resolved
2012-07-30 09:49 Blzut3 Resolution waiting for zdoom => fixed
2012-07-30 17:40 Torr Samaho Note Added: 0004147
2012-07-30 20:54 Blzut3 Note Added: 0004149
2012-07-31 19:11 Torr Samaho Note Added: 0004165
2018-11-25 23:02 Blzut3 Status resolved => closed




Questions or other issues? Contact Us.

Links

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 MantisBT Team
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker