Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2025-06-19 11:01 UTC | ![]() |
My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Zandronum Issue Support Ranking | Rules | My Account |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
0003099 | Zandronum | [All Projects] Suggestion | public | 2017-04-27 20:04 | 2017-04-27 21:19 | ||||||||
Reporter | Korshun | ||||||||||||
Assigned To | |||||||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always | ||||||||
Status | new | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
Platform | Microsoft | OS | Windows | OS Version | XP/Vista/7 | ||||||||
Product Version | 3.0-beta | ||||||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||||||
Summary | 0003099: ReliablePuke | ||||||||||||
Description | Add new latent functions ReliablePuke and ReliablePukeNamed to easily puke scripts reliably and without double puking. | ||||||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||||||
![]() |
|
Korshun (reporter) 2017-04-27 20:06 edited on: 2017-04-27 20:16 |
Oh no, severity should be "feature", not "major". Also, it is fine if this request is postponed indefinitely due to lack of a reliable client -> server communication system in Zandronum. It can be worked around if you write ACS correctly, but most modders don't know how to do that. |
jdagenet (reporter) 2017-04-27 21:16 edited on: 2017-04-27 21:19 |
I'd imagine this would require a complete overhaul of the netcode and script puking system -- something that's not exactly a concern nor a demand at the moment. From what I've found, puked scripts that fail are the result of unstable connections from the client. That is, frequently dropped connections and packets not ever reaching the server. As you mentioned, stacked executions of puke commands will lower the chance of the packet not ever reaching the server. If the server STILL doesn't receive those packets then there's nothing you can really do on your end but code in fail-safes and sanity checks to account for situations like that. |
Only registered users can voice their support. Click here to register, or here to log in. | |
Supporters: | Korshun KirovNoir JC Tenton |
Opponents: | No one explicitly opposes this issue yet. |
![]() |
|||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2017-04-27 20:04 | Korshun | New Issue | |
2017-04-27 20:06 | Korshun | Note Added: 0017376 | |
2017-04-27 20:07 | Korshun | Note Edited: 0017376 | View Revisions |
2017-04-27 20:16 | Korshun | Note Edited: 0017376 | View Revisions |
2017-04-27 21:16 | jdagenet | Note Added: 0017378 | |
2017-04-27 21:19 | jdagenet | Note Edited: 0017378 | View Revisions |
Copyright © 2000 - 2025 MantisBT Team |