0002028: Allow spectators on demos use noclip

Notes
(0011136) Leonard (developer) 2014-12-30 00:52	'https://bitbucket.org/Torr_Samaho/zandronum-stable/pull-request/121/changed-free-spectators-can-now-use-the/diff [^]'

(0011138) Torr Samaho (administrator) 2014-12-30 12:00	I agree that it's a good idea to allow noclip in free spectate mode when watching demos, but I left some technical comments on how to improve the implementation in the pull request.

(0011141) cobalt (updater) 2014-12-30 16:42	Issue addressed by commit faad1e14b105: Changed: Free spectators can now use the noclip cheat in demos. (fixes 2028) Committed by Leonard on Tuesday 30 December 2014 17:02:49 Changes in files: docs/zandronum-history.txt \| 1 + src/c_cmds.cpp \| 4 +++- src/cl_demo.cpp \| 7 +++++++ src/cl_demo.h \| 1 + src/m_cheat.cpp \| 3 ++- 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(0011142) Karakurt (reporter) 2014-12-30 19:25	Would be cool to have this while spectating at all. I'm not implying make it so we fly throught walls, but having the spec' camera teleport to the edge of an obstacle or to the top of a wall when hitting it, like Zdaemon.

(0011143) Torr Samaho (administrator) 2014-12-30 21:03 edited on: 2014-12-30 21:03	Since 1.1, spectators can use noclip.

(0011144) Edward-san (developer) 2014-12-30 21:08	I was thinking about allowing 'idclip/idspispopd' key cheats, too. How much possible is that?

(0011173) Arco (updater) 2015-01-01 18:13	Issue fixed in r150101-1703.

(0011183) Torr Samaho (administrator) 2015-01-01 18:31	Quote from Edward-san I was thinking about allowing 'idclip/idspispopd' key cheats, too. How much possible is that? Should be quite possible. This are just different means to activate the noclip cheat.

**Issue Community Support**
This issue is already marked as resolved. If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why.
Supporters:	No one explicitly supports this issue yet.
Opponents:	No one explicitly opposes this issue yet.

Issue Community Support

This issue is already marked as resolved.
If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why.

Supporters:

No one explicitly supports this issue yet.

Opponents:

No one explicitly opposes this issue yet.

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2014-12-16 01:44	ibm5155	New Issue
2014-12-30 00:52	Leonard	Note Added: 0011136
2014-12-30 12:00	Torr Samaho	Note Added: 0011138
2014-12-30 12:00	Torr Samaho	Status	new => feedback
2014-12-30 16:42	cobalt	Status	feedback => needs testing
2014-12-30 16:42	cobalt	Target Version	=> 1.4
2014-12-30 16:42	cobalt	Description Updated	View Revisions
2014-12-30 16:42	cobalt	Note Added: 0011141
2014-12-30 19:25	Karakurt	Note Added: 0011142
2014-12-30 21:03	Torr Samaho	Note Added: 0011143
2014-12-30 21:03	Torr Samaho	Note Edited: 0011143	View Revisions
2014-12-30 21:04	Torr Samaho	Note Revision Dropped: 11143: 0006208
2014-12-30 21:08	Edward-san	Note Added: 0011144
2014-12-31 10:58	Torr Samaho	Product Version	2.0-beta => 1.3
2014-12-31 10:58	Torr Samaho	Description Updated	View Revisions
2015-01-01 18:13	Arco	Note Added: 0011173
2015-01-01 18:13	Arco	Status	needs testing => resolved
2015-01-01 18:13	Arco	Fixed in Version	=> 2.0
2015-01-01 18:13	Arco	Resolution	open => fixed
2015-01-01 18:13	Arco	Assigned To	=> Arco
2015-01-01 18:31	Torr Samaho	Note Added: 0011183
2018-09-30 23:10	Blzut3	Status	resolved => closed

Relationships