0000002: Crouch Toggle doesn't work online

Notes
(0000028) Torr Samaho (administrator) 2010-09-11 12:10	I think I found a way to let the client toggle crouch without writing any new net code (uses +crouch and +crouch internally). Can somebody test if this works sufficiently well: 'http://www.dailydoomer.com/tsst/misc/SkullDev98dCrouchToggleTest.7z [^]'

(0000032) unknownna (updater) 2010-09-12 03:36 edited on: 2010-09-12 13:29	It works, but there's a difference between online and offline behaviour. Offline, if in crouch mode, jumping doesn't alter your viewpoint and sprite, but online, if jumping while in crouch mode, your viewpoint and sprite changes back to the regular height and sprite until you release the jump button. Offline, while holding jump, you cannot toggle crouch until you release the jump button. Online you can. Edit: And BTW, can you enable client-side prediction for crouching? Offline, there's a smooth transition in the viewpoint from standing to crouching, but online it's fast and instant.

(0000041) Torr Samaho (administrator) 2010-09-12 19:40	Since the online version is implemented very differently it's not surprising that it doesn't behave exactly the same. From what you report, I'd say it works sufficiently well though. Agreed? IIRC client side prediction for crouching isn't implemented. If you would like to have it, please make a feature request. I personally don't think that it's really necessary though.

(0000050) unknownna (updater) 2010-09-13 02:33	It works, but I really think that client-side prediction for crouching is crucial from a practical point of view. The instant transition also has some shakiness to it, so it can be quite disorienting if you use it a lot while aiming and such. It'd be like not having jumping predicted.

(0000076) Torr Samaho (administrator) 2010-09-18 18:01	Crouch toggling should now work sufficiently well. The fact that there is no client side prediction for crouching is a completely separate issue that it not only limited to toggling crouch.

**Issue Community Support**
This issue is already marked as resolved. If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why.
Supporters:	No one explicitly supports this issue yet.
Opponents:	No one explicitly opposes this issue yet.

Issue Community Support

This issue is already marked as resolved.
If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why.

Supporters:

No one explicitly supports this issue yet.

Opponents:

No one explicitly opposes this issue yet.

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2010-08-23 19:09	Torr Samaho	New Issue
2010-09-05 17:45	Torr Samaho	Status	new => confirmed
2010-09-05 17:49	Torr Samaho	Steps to Reproduce Updated	View Revisions
2010-09-06 18:39	Torr Samaho	Additional Information Updated	View Revisions
2010-09-11 12:06	Torr Samaho	Assigned To	=> Torr Samaho
2010-09-11 12:06	Torr Samaho	Status	confirmed => assigned
2010-09-11 12:10	Torr Samaho	Note Added: 0000028
2010-09-11 12:10	Torr Samaho	Status	assigned => feedback
2010-09-11 12:12	Torr Samaho	Product Version	=> 98c
2010-09-12 03:36	unknownna	Note Added: 0000032
2010-09-12 12:44	unknownna	Note Edited: 0000032	View Revisions
2010-09-12 13:29	unknownna	Note Edited: 0000032	View Revisions
2010-09-12 19:40	Torr Samaho	Note Added: 0000041
2010-09-12 19:40	Torr Samaho	Status	feedback => assigned
2010-09-12 19:41	Torr Samaho	Status	assigned => feedback
2010-09-13 02:33	unknownna	Note Added: 0000050
2010-09-18 18:01	Torr Samaho	Note Added: 0000076
2010-09-18 18:01	Torr Samaho	Status	feedback => assigned
2010-09-18 18:01	Torr Samaho	Status	assigned => resolved
2010-09-18 18:01	Torr Samaho	Fixed in Version	=> 98d
2010-09-18 18:01	Torr Samaho	Resolution	open => fixed
2012-06-09 13:22	Torr Samaho	Category	General => Bug
2018-09-30 19:47	Blzut3	Status	resolved => closed

Relationships