0000777: [Hexen] Glitter bridge is "spawned twice" online, when it is spawned by map

Notes
(0003294) Dusk (developer) 2012-04-15 18:45 edited on: 2012-04-15 18:53	Fixed: Stray bridge balls were included in snapshots: 'https://bitbucket.org/CrimsonDusk/notebola/changeset/3ff28924fdda [^]' > I also tried to use Thing mover on glitter bridge. It worked offline, but it was not moving online. Maybe it was caused by this problem? Yeah. Would be nice if the example wad had a showcase of this, though..

(0003296) Torr Samaho (administrator) 2012-04-15 19:47	I added the patch, but I think the approach in the fix is incompatible with dynamically altering the bridges. So if bridges are going to be moved or removed in game, the whole approach most likely will have to be revised.

(0003300) Dusk (developer) 2012-04-15 20:29	How come? If the bridges are moved, the bridge balls will follow it once clients are told about the move.

(0003307) Hisymak (reporter) 2012-04-15 22:09	I added example wad with actor mover used on glitter bridge. It would be cool if it worked online.

(0003324) Dusk (developer) 2012-04-16 17:27	Does the mover work properly online with the latest beta? Further thinking about this, I'd think the best solution would be to include bridge balls in snapshots, but also tell clients of the bridge/ball relationship and have bridges in said updates not call A_BridgeInit. Or something like that.. but for now, I think the current solution is feasible.

(0003325) Hisymak (reporter) 2012-04-16 19:30	No. Even other things don't work. I created new issue. Tried with newest beta release. But glitter bridges are okay now.

(0003326) Dusk (developer) 2012-04-16 22:06	OK then, since the actor mover issue is in a new ticket and as bridges are confirmed to work properly in the latest beta, I'll mark this as resolved.

**Issue Community Support**
This issue is already marked as resolved. If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why.
Supporters:	No one explicitly supports this issue yet.
Opponents:	No one explicitly opposes this issue yet.

Issue Community Support

This issue is already marked as resolved.
If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why.

Supporters:

No one explicitly supports this issue yet.

Opponents:

No one explicitly opposes this issue yet.

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2012-04-15 14:05	Hisymak	New Issue
2012-04-15 14:05	Hisymak	File Added: glitterbridge.wad
2012-04-15 14:06	Hisymak	File Added: glitterbridge.png
2012-04-15 15:38	Dusk	Assigned To	=> Dusk
2012-04-15 15:38	Dusk	Status	new => assigned
2012-04-15 17:37	Dusk	Product Version	98d => 1.0-beta
2012-04-15 18:45	Dusk	Note Added: 0003294
2012-04-15 18:45	Dusk	Status	assigned => feedback
2012-04-15 18:53	Dusk	Note Edited: 0003294	View Revisions
2012-04-15 19:47	Torr Samaho	Note Added: 0003296
2012-04-15 20:29	Dusk	Note Added: 0003300
2012-04-15 22:08	Hisymak	File Added: mover.wad
2012-04-15 22:09	Hisymak	Note Added: 0003307
2012-04-15 22:09	Hisymak	Status	feedback => assigned
2012-04-16 17:27	Dusk	Note Added: 0003324
2012-04-16 17:27	Dusk	Status	assigned => feedback
2012-04-16 19:30	Hisymak	Note Added: 0003325
2012-04-16 19:30	Hisymak	Status	feedback => assigned
2012-04-16 22:06	Dusk	Note Added: 0003326
2012-04-16 22:06	Dusk	Status	assigned => resolved
2012-04-16 22:06	Dusk	Resolution	open => fixed
2012-04-16 22:07	Dusk	Relationship added	related to 0000788
2012-06-09 13:22	Torr Samaho	Category	General => Bug
2018-09-30 22:47	Blzut3	Status	resolved => closed