Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2025-06-15 21:45 UTC | ![]() |
My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Site Issue Support Ranking | Rules | My Account |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
0003602 | Site | [All Projects] Documentation | public | 2019-02-07 13:50 | 2019-02-11 14:37 | ||||||||
Reporter | WubTheCaptain | ||||||||||||
Assigned To | |||||||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always | ||||||||
Status | new | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||||||
Summary | 0003602: debian.drdteam.org doesn't publish the key fingerprint to packages | ||||||||||||
Description | Quote from apt-key(8) apt-secure(8) instructs to: Quote from apt-secure(8) | ||||||||||||
Steps To Reproduce | Visit'http://debian.drdteam.org/ [^]' and see there's no fingerprint on that instruction page, only the key. (HTTPS scheme is available.) | ||||||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||||||
![]() |
|
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2019-02-07 13:53 edited on: 2019-02-07 14:05 |
We don't have information anywhere else either, such as in Doomseeker's README instructions. I'd like to add it there. Right now there's OpenPGP chain of trust, but that key I downloaded from debian.drdteam.org is also not signed by other parties (such as me, Zalewa or Pol M). $ gpg --fingerprint 0x392203ABAF88540B pub rsa2048/0x392203ABAF88540B 2012-05-08 [SC] Key fingerprint = 0D8F 900A B77B B504 F2C6 9E7A 3922 03AB AF88 540B uid [ unknown] Braden Obrzut <admin@maniacsvault.net> sub rsa2048/0x5A3EE478F1967822 2012-05-08 [E] Key fingerprint = 08BF 77FB DD76 1544 E87B 6430 5A3E E478 F196 7822 I refreshed from'hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net [^]' keyserver too, no change. |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2019-02-07 13:56 |
Also, no verification happens the downloaded key matches the "trusted" key. See related issue 0003601. |
Blzut3 (administrator) 2019-02-10 07:54 |
Not sure why you mentioned names on the "other parties" thing since I believe if following strict protocol you should not sign a key without meeting in person? |
WubTheCaptain (reporter) 2019-02-11 14:37 |
You are right, Blzut3. I think a good place to mention "Packages are signed with key XXXX XXXX ..." at'https://zandronum.com/download#instubuntu [^]' would still be a nice improvement, rather than no information at all. Those two domains are hosted on different hosts. |
Only registered users can voice their support. Click here to register, or here to log in. | |
Supporters: | No one explicitly supports this issue yet. |
Opponents: | No one explicitly opposes this issue yet. |
![]() |
|||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2019-02-07 13:50 | WubTheCaptain | New Issue | |
2019-02-07 13:53 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0020340 | |
2019-02-07 13:56 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0020341 | |
2019-02-07 14:05 | WubTheCaptain | Note Edited: 0020340 | View Revisions |
2019-02-10 07:54 | Blzut3 | Note Added: 0020358 | |
2019-02-11 14:37 | WubTheCaptain | Note Added: 0020362 |
Copyright © 2000 - 2025 MantisBT Team |