Ænima wrote:Spoiler: (Open)// Master Banlist //
194.228.150.*: Capodecima - Asking for cheats, drama, idiot - August 15th 2012
2.90.*.*:Thunder - Cheating
62.149.*.*:Thunder - Extra Range
77.30.*.*:Thunder - Cheating
84.235.*.*:Thunder - Extra Range
94.97.*.*:Thunder - Extra Range
94.98*.*:Thunder - Cheating - 94.98.37.192
94.99.*.*:Thunder - Cheating - 94.99.222.172
212.118.*.*:Thunder - Extra Range
72.221.*.*:bfgcrunch - Cheating - July 4th 2012 - 72.221.77.237
76.94.158*:gakupo - Cheating - July 25th 2012 - 76.94.158.201
77.39.*.*: Jython - Cheating - July 15th 2012 - 77.39.51.122
194.8.*.*: Jython - Ban evasion - July 22nd 2012 - 194.8.129.155
79.10.36.*:the great white - Cheating - June 29th 2012 - 79.10.36.214
79.12.45.*:the great white - Cheating - July 6th 2012 - 79.12.45.30
82.51.94.*:the great white - Cheating - July 9th 2012 - 82.51.94.13
82.131.3.*:never - Cheating - august 2nd 2012 - 82.131.3.193
84.244.92.*:Jigsaw - Cheating - 84.244.92.50 - July 31 2012
88.152.221.*: GraupLP - Cheating - July 24th 2012 - 88.152.221.115
93.206.118.*: Neurosphere - Cheating - 93.206.118.172 - July 30th 2012
93.206.*.*:Neurospere - Ban evading - 93.206.108.177 - Aug 9 2012
24.127.*.*:Kal_foxis - extra range - Perm
71.229.*.*:Kal Foxis - Cheating
76.110.*.*:Kal Foxis - Cheating
98.77.46.*: Kal_Foxis - Hacker - 98.77.46.65 - September 29, 2011
98.254.156.*:Kal_Foxis - Ban Evading - 98.254.156.38 - BFFBot
98.254.*.*:Kalfoxis - Cheating - 4/7/11
108.129.*.*:Kalfoxis - March 1, 2012
99.90.*.*: unixassassin - Cheating - April 2012 - 99.90.1.16
90.177.98.*:Number One Blind - Cheating - 90.177.98.81 - August 4th 2012
95.42.*.*:gouki - Ban Evading - 95.42.87.173 - 09/25/2011 || Updated to /16 - 95.42.89.96 - Feburary 13, 2012
97.103.177.*:ssjdoommaniac - Cheating - June 29th 2012 - 97.103.177.72 - Cheating
62.78.*.*:Sequelbase
83.145.*.*:Sequelbase
67.176.*.*:window/terror - cheating - 67.176.96.156 - August 8th 2012
68.61.104.*:Tenchu - Cheating - 68.61.104.93 - Permanent
68.62.40.*:Tenchu - Cheating - 68.62.40.254 - Permanent
68.83.192.*:Tenchu - 68.83.192.117 - March 13, 2012
71.197.26.*:Tenchu - 71.197.26.176 - March 15, 2012
86.96.226.*:Eoe9000/Feldspar/Tenchu - Evading - 86.96.226.25 - Perm
98.250.101.*:Tenchu - Evading - 98.250.101.180 - Feburary 12, 2012
99.32.*.*:Tenchu - 99.32.168.118 - June 18, 2012
69.46.*.*:Dr_noob - Evading - 69.46.69.194 - 11/8/11
173.27.*.*:dr_noob - Cheating - 173.27.32.210 - 10/14/11 | Updated to /16 - 173.27.33.29 - November 7, 2011
173.28.*.*:dr_noob - Evading - 173.28.174.241 - Feburary 12, 2012
173.28.46.*:dr_noob - Cheating - 173.28.46.35 - August 17, 2011
173.28.47.*:dr_noob - Evading - 173.28.47.192 - October 24, 2011
173.29.254.*:dr_noob - IP Update - 173.29.254.189 - March 30, 2012
173.29.*.*:dr_noob - 173.29.252.52 - April 2, 2012
76.73.*.*:dr_noob - Proxy - 76.73.3.221 76.73.18.131 - Ban evasion - July 28th 2012
//69.158.*.*:Mr-Cheater - Evading - 69.158.166.228 - December 7, 2011
//64.229.*.*:Mr-Cheater / Reach_Term - 64.229.236.175 - June 21, 2012
//70.51.159.*: Mr.Cheater (Netsky) - Evading - 70.51.159.3 - May 13, 2011
//99.248.*.*:Mr Cheater
//99.249.*.*:Mr-Cheater - You ban evaded for the last time - Metalhead
//173.33.*.*:Mr Cheater - Not welcome
//174.88.*.*:Mr-Cheater - Need i say more? - 174.88.218.165 - May 22, 2011
//184.145.71.*:Mr-Cheater - Nuff Said - 184.145.71.50 - July 23, 2011
82.131.51.*:DSGAMER[RUS] - WallHacking - 82.131.51.9
188.163.*.*:DSGAMER[RUS] - WallHacking - 188.163.41.137
82.147.*.*:xdlvzx - WallHacking - extra IP || source: http://www.nirsoft.net/countryip/ee.html
89.235.243.*:xdlvzx - WallHacking - 89.235.243.71
212.7.*.*:xdlvzx - WallHacking - extra IP - source: http://www.nirsoft.net/countryip/ee.html
82.141.*.*:Ironicuz - Ban evasion - July 16th 2012 - 82.141.123.46
85.217.*.*:Ironicuz - Cheating - July 6th 2012 - 85.217.13.54
82.173.*.*:n1p4z
88.112.10.:N1p4z - Not Welcome Here - 88.112.10.102
88.114.*.*:Nipaz - Not Welcome Here - 88.114.149.115
91.154.*.*:N1paz
91.155.*.*:N1paz
187.7.42.*:brazilIan666 - Cheating - 187.7.42.66 - July 31st 2012
189.30.*.*:[<o>]brazilIan666 - Ban evading/Cheating - 189.30.69.157 - Aug 4th 2012
189.75.*.*:[<o>]brazilIan666 - Ban evading/Cheating - 189.75.40.226 - August 5th 2012
187.55.*.*:[<o>]brazilIan666 - Ban evading - 187.55.226.92 - August 14th 2012
188.232.187.*:skill bot - Cheating - 188.232.187.142 - July 30th 2012
189.107.*.*:Fuckyea - Cheating - 189.107.234.251 - 10/31/11
200.150.*.*:(BDS)Fuckyea - Cheating - 200.150.45.210 - 10/14/11
201.62.161.*:Fuckyea - 201.62.161.58 - November 7, 2011
201.62.216.*:Fuckyea - 201.62.216.163 - Evading - May 24, 2012
201.58.*.*:Fuckyea - 201.58.75.201 - Evading - June 1, 2012
85.71.184.220:aeyes - Cheating - 85.71.184.220 - March 14, 2011 || http://www.mediafire.com/?sgadl91rrze8tnz
178.32.239.102:Ishi/aeyes - Cheating - Feburary 18, 2012 | VPN/Proxy
76.73.96.75:Ishi/aeyes - Evading - ^^^
69.210.*.*:Supermarvel/Plasma - Evading - 69.210.249.154 - Feburary 27, 2012
69.211.*.*:Supermarvel - Impersonating - 69.211.8.155 - MiFU - 24/01/2012 !Upgraded to /16 since ban evasion - +3 Months -28/01/2012!
165.166.153.*:Helten
23.29.*.*:Juvenile - SoulReap - 23.29.5.38 - May 12, 2012
74.202.*.*:soulreap AKA Doom, PC17, Shadowfox, Creed, and more - Cheating/Evading - 74.202.201.160 - January 8, 2012
206.169.217.*:shogun9x - soulreap/Shadowfox - 206.169.217.133 - March 22, 2012
209.234.*.*:Creed - Cheating - 209.234.217.76 - 9/20/11
92.6.45.*:OzaKA - Raged for it - 92.6.45.5 - April 8, 2012
92.6.*.*:OzaKA/Drake - Evading - 92.6.43.209 - May 11, 2012
92.10.236.*:Hawk/OzaKA - Cheating/Evading - 92.10.236.218 - April 23, 2012 || Updated to /16 (Drake) - 92.10.228.112 - May 6, 2012
68.34.126.*:Shane - Cheating - 68.34.126.82 - April 22, 2012
68.49.13.*:Shane - Cheating - 68.49.13.121 - April 22, 2012
68.55.*.*:Shane - Ban evading - 68.55.94.172 - July 9th 2012
96.244.32.*:Shane - Cheating - 96.244.32.100 - April 22, 2012
98.218.137.*:Shane - Cheating - 98.218.137.45 - April 22, 2012
189.225.212.*:Reck - Cheating - 189.225.212.92 - 9/22/11
189.245.114.*:De$pair - Cheating - 189.245.114.202 - April 21, 2012
189.245.145.*:Reck - Cheating - 189.245.145.148 - 10/1/11
189.245.*.*:De$pAiR - Cheating/Evading - 189.245.97.185 - May 3, 2012
201.103.108.*:DespAir aka Reck - Cheating - 201.103.108.127 - April 27, 2012
212.86.*.*:(P)[en]forser*wtf - Cheating - 212.86.238.105 - Aug 02 2012
31.7.60.221:david - extra range - June 29th 2012
184.170.129.114: david - Extra range - June 29th 2012
217.132.*.*:david - Impersonation, server impersonation - June 29th 2012
217.132.*.*:david - Impersonation, server impersonation - June 29th 2012
96.49.50.*:Zap610 Impersonator - Impersonation, cheating - July 3rd 2012
85.64.239.*:Mazter Impersonator - 85.64.239.136 - August 14th 2012
216.40.169.*: The red baron - Cheating - July 18th 2012
Take a look through the above list and tell me ... Who would you whitelist?
Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
Nobody seemed to answer my question from before ...
Ænima wrote:Spoiler: (Open)
Take a look through the above list and tell me ... Who would you whitelist?
Reinforcements: midgame Survival joining/respawning
Doom64: Unabsolved: Doom64 + Diablo II
ZandroSkins: a pack made by our community
AeniPuffs: 3D blood and bullet puff effects, free to use for your own mods
Squad Radio: a WASD-based radio chat menu, add your own custom sounds!
Mercenaries (on hold)
Doom64: Unabsolved: Doom64 + Diablo II
ZandroSkins: a pack made by our community
AeniPuffs: 3D blood and bullet puff effects, free to use for your own mods
Squad Radio: a WASD-based radio chat menu, add your own custom sounds!
Mercenaries (on hold)
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
Qent wrote: Possibly capo. Just maybe Dr. Noob for short periods, so as not to give anyone permanent brain damage.
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
I was hoping to get an answer from server hosters though ... not saying that you aren't, Qent. :p
Reinforcements: midgame Survival joining/respawning
Doom64: Unabsolved: Doom64 + Diablo II
ZandroSkins: a pack made by our community
AeniPuffs: 3D blood and bullet puff effects, free to use for your own mods
Squad Radio: a WASD-based radio chat menu, add your own custom sounds!
Mercenaries (on hold)
Doom64: Unabsolved: Doom64 + Diablo II
ZandroSkins: a pack made by our community
AeniPuffs: 3D blood and bullet puff effects, free to use for your own mods
Squad Radio: a WASD-based radio chat menu, add your own custom sounds!
Mercenaries (on hold)
-
Metal
- Retired Staff / Community Team Member
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:18 am
- Location: Canada
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
Ænima wrote: Nobody seemed to answer my question from before ...
Ænima wrote:Spoiler: (Open)
Take a look through the above list and tell me ... Who would you whitelist?
I look at this list, and I ask the very same question. But hey, it's their servers. Let them unban any idiot they want. On one token, I see it as a slap in the face, going through all kinds of crap to ban these people and others want to go ahead and unban them. But on the other side of the token, like I said, it's their servers. Double edged sword, I guess.
<EazyDI>harrased me
<EazyDI>and called me a dinner
<EazyDI>n*****
<EazyDI>lmao not dinner
<EazyDI>and called me a dinner
<EazyDI>n*****
<EazyDI>lmao not dinner
-
Reach Term
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:45 pm
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
Ænima wrote: Nobody seemed to answer my question from before ...
Ænima wrote:Spoiler: (Open)
Take a look through the above list and tell me ... Who would you whitelist?
Spoiler: TL;DR (Open)
Honestly... Why are you making a big stink about it? The server admins are not gonna unban the cheaters, regardless of how or why they did it. I think this whole force master banlist was kinda like a massive fuck you for those people who are paying, taking time working on the servers and engaging the community with all this. I don't see Cyber, Metal, Warton or the rest of the community admins building server clusters for this community.(K6 is an irc opper, HTH!) The reason why I'm praising this new community is because I'm dumbfounded of how they act towards people, this topic and the potentially being neutral and fairness for everyone in this community. If server hosters want to allow cheaters to join then those servers would become infamy of the problem. MBL is nothing more but a sore spot in this community because if someone gets banned and a whole bunch people get pissed about, it'll be nothing but drama after drama after drama. Also, how dare you imply(although you might have been lazy and copy and paste) that I am still banned, I am still here and at least I'm being neutral with everyone.
My own opinion, this is good for everyone... but like every system, there's drama. However, if we work as a community then we shall thrive as a community. Because why should I trust the admins' jugdement on one person.
Also this is good for people who get banned for non-cheating and still enjoys playing the game, as long they don't cause trouble and stay under the radar, you'll be fine...
Last edited by Reach Term on Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
Ænima wrote: Nobody seemed to answer my question from before ...
Ænima wrote:Spoiler: (Open)
Take a look through the above list and tell me ... Who would you whitelist?
I can understand why it might be easy to rationalize keeping the master the way it is because of the current size of the master banlist, but it's the principle of the matter. Regardless of what specific bans are on the master banlist, or how many bans, a server owner who spends their own time, money and resources to hosting servers for the community should reserve the final call on who ultimately plays on their servers. That's not saying it shouldn't be heavily regulated. It should absolutey be regulated. The master banlist should be enabled by default, as well as servers being marked on server launchers when they even go so much as to whitelist a single master ban. The players deserve to know they're connecting to a server that isn't wholly enforcing the masters banlist, even if it is only one excemption.
Metal wrote: I look at this list, and I ask the very same question. But hey, it's their servers. Let them unban any idiot they want. On one token, I see it as a slap in the face, going through all kinds of crap to ban these people and others want to go ahead and unban them. But on the other side of the token, like I said, it's their servers. Double edged sword, I guess.
Maybe some server hosts don't want you thinking for them. I know if I was the owner of a server cluster, I would want complete control over how my servers are managed. I would prefer to utilize my own judgement over my banlists, and mine alone. It's like you said, and like what the majority of people here are saying; it's their servers. Let them run them how they like. IMO the true authority of the master server should lie in the moderation of servers rather than players, such as the policing of 'rouge' server sets and master listing exploits and such. Let the server owners take the Zandro's recommended player bans (the master banlist) into consideration and make the call for themselves when it comes to players.
Last edited by Valance on Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Metal
- Retired Staff / Community Team Member
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:18 am
- Location: Canada
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
It's not about doing the thinking for them. All I'm saying is there's two sides to it. I partly agree with it, and I partly don't. I'm pretty much undecided.Valance wrote: Maybe some server hosts don't want you thinking for them. I know if I was the owner of a server cluster, I would want complete control over how my servers are managed. I would prefer to utilize my own judgement over my banlists, and mine alone. It's like you said, and like what the majority of people here are saying; it's their servers. Let them run them how they like. IMO the true authority of the master server should lie in the moderation of servers rather than players, such as the policing of 'rouge' server sets and master listing exploits and such. Let the server owners take the Zandro's recommended player bans (the master banlist) into consideration and make the call for themselves when it comes to players.
<EazyDI>harrased me
<EazyDI>and called me a dinner
<EazyDI>n*****
<EazyDI>lmao not dinner
<EazyDI>and called me a dinner
<EazyDI>n*****
<EazyDI>lmao not dinner
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
Ænima wrote: Nobody seemed to answer my question from before ...
Ænima wrote:Spoiler: (Open)
Take a look through the above list and tell me ... Who would you whitelist?
I dont think it really matters who server admins want to whitelist. I dont think anyone is going to not check their demos and constantly hawk them to make sure they're not cheating in game. at least the decent server admins will do this. there will probably be that one or two fringe servers that allow everyone and anyone on them but those are going to a) be marked as not allowing the masterlist and b) terrible servers.
give server admins some credit, they know what they're doing
-
Tenchu
- Retired Staff / Community Team Member
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:29 am
- Location: Nocru illa dan
- Clan: Lost Faction
- Clan Tag: LF
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
I was debating if I should bother having any say in this topic for obvious reasons (and for good reason, I was expecting the idiot posts from people like AEnima and Konar sooner or later) but at this point the topic seems to have died down a bit so what the hell.
I definitely agree that servers who opt to un-enforce or whitelist a masterban should be marked as un-enforcing on server launchers. Not so much for the sub-community competitive servers like NJ and BE, but it would be very helpful for the general population servers like the coop servers and such who don't know/care about the people on the master banlist and Skulltag politics. If this was passed, IDE and Doomseeker (or whatever Zandro's launcher will be called) should separate un-enforcing servers on the listing from the enforcing servers. They should group the enforcing together in one section, and the un-enforcing together in a different section, so that enforcing and un-enforcing servers aren't listed all mixed in with each other. Would make it much more clear to players which servers enforce or not.
I definitely agree that servers who opt to un-enforce or whitelist a masterban should be marked as un-enforcing on server launchers. Not so much for the sub-community competitive servers like NJ and BE, but it would be very helpful for the general population servers like the coop servers and such who don't know/care about the people on the master banlist and Skulltag politics. If this was passed, IDE and Doomseeker (or whatever Zandro's launcher will be called) should separate un-enforcing servers on the listing from the enforcing servers. They should group the enforcing together in one section, and the un-enforcing together in a different section, so that enforcing and un-enforcing servers aren't listed all mixed in with each other. Would make it much more clear to players which servers enforce or not.
Last edited by Tenchu on Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
[22:42:21] [@SkullRush] ok guys today was one of the worst days of my life i spent p much 18 hours in my pc watching hentai and played doom with huge lag i guess i shiould go to bed now
[22:42:26] [@SkullRush] if i dont suicide, see you guys tomorrow
[22:42:29] [@SkullRush] bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb^_^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[22:43:02] • Quit: (SkullRush) (~SkullRush@SkullRush.users.zandronum.com) ("Quitting")
[22:43:40] [+Jenova] wow
[22:43:47] [+Jenova] ur avg zandronum player ladies and gentlemen
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
That'd be a really sweet idea ten, maybe even have a filtered server list on ide or doomseeker so that players who really dont want any part with masterbanned players can automatically untick servers with it on
-
TheHelten
- New User
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:41 am
- Location: The Hive
- Clan: Liquid Metal
- Clan Tag: [LiMe]
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
I agree with both optional enforcement and Ten's post regarding the master server.
Edit: Also, I see no situation in which all servers would conspire and ignore one or more master bans; some hosts have too much of a beef between eachother to agree on anything.
Edit: Also, I see no situation in which all servers would conspire and ignore one or more master bans; some hosts have too much of a beef between eachother to agree on anything.
Last edited by TheHelten on Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Does anyone even take the time to copy these small lines of text, and paste them into a notepad or quick-post box to read what they say? I'm curious, message me if you read this, will ya? ~Helten
-
Hammerfest-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:45 am
- Clan: A3.33333333333333333
- Clan Tag: A3.33333333
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
That's pretty much true at this point. Server hosts have different views on how the servers should be maintained, you can see how just by looking at posts from server hosts from Granvoid, FC+, Best.Ever., etc.. The whole "If optional enforcement is allowed they will conspire against the master ban list, etc." sounds like something really silly and I highly doubt it would ever happen, let alone the fact that I have actually not seen server hosts cooperate with other server hosts.TheHelten wrote: I agree with both optional enforcement and Ten's post regarding the master server.
Edit: Also, I see no situation in which all servers would conspire and ignore one or more master bans; some hosts have too much of a beef between eachother to agree on anything.
I'll post more in the future on this topic, because I have been in support of this (I am for the option to whether or not enforce the master ban-list) since the last time this topic was brought up back in the Skulltag era. However, I tend to agree with Qent and some others that there should be some kind of warning given to those who don't know where they're walking into.
Swift as a breeze, fierce as a gale.
-
TheHelten
- New User
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:41 am
- Location: The Hive
- Clan: Liquid Metal
- Clan Tag: [LiMe]
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
Sounds nice, but it all depends on what kind of warning is provided. It could be more of a welcoming message, or more of a pushing-away message; unless it was simply "This server does not enforce the master ban list."Hammerfest- wrote: However, I tend to agree with Qent and some others that there should be some kind of warning given to those who don't know where they're walking into.
Does anyone even take the time to copy these small lines of text, and paste them into a notepad or quick-post box to read what they say? I'm curious, message me if you read this, will ya? ~Helten
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
"This server does not enforce the master ban list." is a nice neutral message. However, newbies may not understand what this entails. Something specific like "This server does not enforce the master ban list, there may be hackers." would probably get the message across.
inb4 "that's unfair branding" ...
inb4 "that's unfair branding" ...
Reinforcements: midgame Survival joining/respawning
Doom64: Unabsolved: Doom64 + Diablo II
ZandroSkins: a pack made by our community
AeniPuffs: 3D blood and bullet puff effects, free to use for your own mods
Squad Radio: a WASD-based radio chat menu, add your own custom sounds!
Mercenaries (on hold)
Doom64: Unabsolved: Doom64 + Diablo II
ZandroSkins: a pack made by our community
AeniPuffs: 3D blood and bullet puff effects, free to use for your own mods
Squad Radio: a WASD-based radio chat menu, add your own custom sounds!
Mercenaries (on hold)
-
Watermelon
- Zandrone
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:07 pm
- Location: Rwanda
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
The only problem here is now that it's open source, you could just compile a client that just dumps the master server banlist or doesn't check it; servers can essentially get around any master server warnings now or anything proposed here (look like a legit server, no warning messages...etc)
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
So then someone will report that server and they'll get banned from hosting on the master server. Not the end of the world. ;p
Edit:
Honestly, I don't see what's to gain from trying to decieve players by circumventing the warning or whitelisting *.*.* from the master banlist. So that your server can be a hacker/troll haven? Is that supposed to make you more popular or is that just intended to piss off the admins? Either way, I'm certain that anyone who attempts something like that would get a swift kick in the ass as soon as the admins find out. Cuz then you'll be banned from hosting on the master.
Edit:
Honestly, I don't see what's to gain from trying to decieve players by circumventing the warning or whitelisting *.*.* from the master banlist. So that your server can be a hacker/troll haven? Is that supposed to make you more popular or is that just intended to piss off the admins? Either way, I'm certain that anyone who attempts something like that would get a swift kick in the ass as soon as the admins find out. Cuz then you'll be banned from hosting on the master.
Last edited by Ænima on Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reinforcements: midgame Survival joining/respawning
Doom64: Unabsolved: Doom64 + Diablo II
ZandroSkins: a pack made by our community
AeniPuffs: 3D blood and bullet puff effects, free to use for your own mods
Squad Radio: a WASD-based radio chat menu, add your own custom sounds!
Mercenaries (on hold)
Doom64: Unabsolved: Doom64 + Diablo II
ZandroSkins: a pack made by our community
AeniPuffs: 3D blood and bullet puff effects, free to use for your own mods
Squad Radio: a WASD-based radio chat menu, add your own custom sounds!
Mercenaries (on hold)
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
There is no way for said admins to "find out" because the hackers in question could just as easily be ban evading as the server could be ban evading. There is no way to tell if a sever is intentionally circumventing the ban list unless you are the intended target of said whitelisting.Ænima wrote: So then someone will report that server and they'll get banned from hosting on the master server. Not the end of the world. ;p
Edit:
Honestly, I don't see what's to gain from trying to decieve players by circumventing the warning or whitelisting *.*.* from the master banlist. So that your server can be a hacker/troll haven? Is that supposed to make you more popular or is that just intended to piss off the admins? Either way, I'm certain that anyone who attempts something like that would get a swift kick in the ass as soon as the admins find out. Cuz then you'll be banned from hosting on the master.
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
Ænima wrote: Nobody seemed to answer my question from before ...
Ænima wrote:Spoiler: (Open)
Take a look through the above list and tell me ... Who would you whitelist?
None of them.
<PUN1SH3R> Cube has a magnetic effect
<PUN1SH3R> all other clans are in orbit with us, they just dont know it
<PUN1SH3R> occasionally cube will pull a player into it's system
[Quote=DwangoUnited Website] Eyes has tainted the DWANGO name in World of Warcraft. Eyes owes several thousand gold to friends that offered to loan it to him. He's since cut us off completely, and is not planning on gaming or paying back what he owes leaving DWANGO United with the debt. You have hurt us in more ways than you can know, pal. I hope you're happy that we've bent over backwards for you. Thanks for paying us back with a spit in the face and a cold shoulder. By the way pal, your bfg skills suck ass.[/quote]
09:08 <Shane_> It's better being a cuck
09:08 <Shane_> Trust me, you'll learn one day
<PUN1SH3R> all other clans are in orbit with us, they just dont know it
<PUN1SH3R> occasionally cube will pull a player into it's system
[Quote=DwangoUnited Website] Eyes has tainted the DWANGO name in World of Warcraft. Eyes owes several thousand gold to friends that offered to loan it to him. He's since cut us off completely, and is not planning on gaming or paying back what he owes leaving DWANGO United with the debt. You have hurt us in more ways than you can know, pal. I hope you're happy that we've bent over backwards for you. Thanks for paying us back with a spit in the face and a cold shoulder. By the way pal, your bfg skills suck ass.[/quote]
09:08 <Shane_> It's better being a cuck
09:08 <Shane_> Trust me, you'll learn one day
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
Always whitelist the brazilians! BRAZIL!!! HUEHUE
Last edited by Ivan on Wed Aug 29, 2012 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
=== RAGNAROK DM ON ... uh... dead forever? ===
=== ALWAYS BET ON ... uh... dead forever? ===
=== Who wanta sum wang? ===
=== Death and Decay - A new Monster/Weapon replacer ===
=== ALWAYS BET ON ... uh... dead forever? ===
=== Who wanta sum wang? ===
=== Death and Decay - A new Monster/Weapon replacer ===
-
Hammerfest-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:45 am
- Clan: A3.33333333333333333
- Clan Tag: A3.33333333
RE: Forcing of the Master Banlist Ideas
Personally I wouldn't care what it says, unfair branding or not. You're on the list for whatever you did, but if people (particularly server hosts) feel that someone deserved to be 'freed and allowed to play', that's their business. Just as long as there's a warning or something that lets people know that "Hey, the master ban-list pretty much doesn't apply here" or some sort of warning. To be honest, new or not to the port, I think "ban list" says a lot on the subject of gaming. I wouldn't see why even newbies would have trouble finding out what this might mean. That's just me though.Ænima wrote: "This server does not enforce the master ban list." is a nice neutral message. However, newbies may not understand what this entails. Something specific like "This server does not enforce the master ban list, there may be hackers." would probably get the message across.
inb4 "that's unfair branding" ...
Swift as a breeze, fierce as a gale.