MantisBT - Zandronum |
View Issue Details |
|
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0000004 | Zandronum | [All Projects] Suggestion | public | 2010-09-05 16:21 | 2018-09-30 22:18 |
|
Reporter | Anonymous | |
Assigned To | Dusk | |
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | |
Platform | | OS | | OS Version | |
Product Version | | |
Target Version | 3.0 | Fixed in Version | 3.0 | |
|
Summary | 0000004: Make ban descriptions a little "nicer". |
Description | I remember this discussion on Doomworld:
'http://www.doomworld.com/vb/doomworld-news/51717-skulltag-98-3rd-mix/ [^]'
Someone was unfairly caught in a range ban and they felt alienated by the ban messages. I think that there are a few things here that could be done better:
1. For local bans, when the user caught in an IP range connects to the server, add a hard-coded message after the ban message that says something to the effect of:
"Your IP (<ip address>) has been banned from this server. If you feel this is in error, please contact <admin email address>."
2. For master bans, use this message:
"Your IP (<ip address>) has been banned from Skulltag. If you feel this is in error, please contact <url to contact form or email address>."
3. For forum bans, remove profanity from the existing bans, and add a link to a contact form or email address, similar to 2.
Just a small thing or two that might go a little way in improving our image. |
Steps To Reproduce | |
Additional Information | By the way, you might want to not give people control over the "priority" of bugs. :) |
Tags | bans |
Relationships | |
Attached Files | |
|
Issue History |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2010-09-05 16:21 | Anonymous | New Issue | |
2010-09-05 16:42 | Blzut3 | Note Added: 0000002 | |
2010-09-05 16:46 | Blzut3 | Description Updated | bug_revision_view_page.php?rev_id=2#r2 |
2010-09-06 16:29 | Blzut3 | Note Added: 0000005 | |
2010-09-06 16:29 | Blzut3 | Status | new => closed |
2010-09-06 16:29 | Blzut3 | Resolution | open => no change required |
2010-09-06 23:45 | Eruanna | Note Added: 0000006 | |
2010-09-06 23:45 | Eruanna | Status | closed => confirmed |
2010-09-07 03:10 | DevilHunter | Note Added: 0000007 | |
2015-09-05 15:23 | Dusk | Assigned To | => Dusk |
2015-09-05 15:23 | Dusk | Status | confirmed => assigned |
2015-09-05 15:23 | Dusk | Resolution | no change required => reopened |
2015-09-05 17:08 | Dusk | Note Added: 0013424 | |
2015-09-05 17:08 | Dusk | Status | assigned => needs review |
2015-09-05 17:45 | cobalt | Status | needs review => needs testing |
2015-09-05 17:45 | cobalt | Target Version | => 3.0 |
2015-09-05 17:45 | cobalt | Description Updated | bug_revision_view_page.php?rev_id=8034#r8034 |
2015-09-05 17:45 | cobalt | Note Added: 0013425 | |
2015-09-11 08:04 | DevilHunter | Note Added: 0013484 | |
2015-09-11 18:51 | Dusk | Note Added: 0013485 | |
2015-09-19 17:54 | DevilHunter | Note Added: 0013533 | |
2015-10-07 16:00 | Dusk | Note Added: 0013625 | |
2015-10-07 16:00 | Dusk | Status | needs testing => resolved |
2015-10-07 16:00 | Dusk | Fixed in Version | => 3.0 |
2015-10-07 16:00 | Dusk | Resolution | reopened => fixed |
2018-09-30 22:18 | Blzut3 | Status | resolved => closed |
Notes |
|
(0000002)
|
Blzut3
|
2010-09-05 16:42
|
|
"By the way, you might want to not give people control over the "priority" of bugs. :)"
I believe you can only set it initially. Once you report we're free to make corrections here. I think for now we should just wait to see if this will be abused. |
|
|
(0000005)
|
Blzut3
|
2010-09-06 16:29
|
|
I was told that administration issues should be kept on the forums, so I'm closing this issue. |
|
|
|
I am reopening this for points 1 and 2 - this isn't COMPLETELY apparant in the original suggestion and they were undermined by point 3 which made this appear to be an admin issue. Nevertheless, point 1 and 2 are meant as points for the Skulltag binary itself, rather than admin practices. This may need further feedback before consideration, however. |
|
|
|
I was gonna make a suggestion like this... But only to the VoteKick Reasons...
Should make it more like "You have been VoteKicked, and Temp-banned for 5 mins."
The current message seems a bit harsh, and I remember we had a discussion about this, but was never put in. Just want to make it more user friendly for everyone.. |
|
|
(0013424)
|
Dusk
|
2015-09-05 17:08
|
|
|
|
(0013425)
|
cobalt
|
2015-09-05 17:45
|
|
|
|
|
Ok... I'm gonna ask it.. How does this work exactly?? Does it just provide the host email to the user? |
|
|
(0013485)
|
Dusk
|
2015-09-11 18:51
|
|
It provides whatever sv_hostemail is set to. |
|
|
|
|
|
(0013625)
|
Dusk
|
2015-10-07 16:00
|
|
WaTaKiD confirmed this is fixed. |
|