MantisBT - Doomseeker
|View Issue Details|
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0003816||Doomseeker||[All Projects] Suggestion||public||2020-06-07 06:19||2020-06-07 20:54|
|Target Version||Fixed in Version|
|Summary||0003816: We don't use clang-tidy and it's not integrated to CMake|
|Description||So... Integrating clang-tidy into CMake.|
Issue 0003591 initially suggested .clang-format. The issue ended up with uncrustify.
I have to admit I never ran uncrustify. Now I learned there's CMAKE_CXX_CLANG_TIDY for CMake, and that seems... more optimal, in a way.
Given that I've been looking for clang-tidy issues manually and reporting issues (12+ I count) from it today (without actually running clang-tidy), it seems like an useful tool. I should ask: Should we integrate clang-tidy with our CMake build process? May turn uncrustify unnecessary, I don't know.
|Steps To Reproduce|
|Additional Information||https://ortogonal.github.io/cmake-clang-tidy/ [^]|
|Tags||No tags attached.|
|2020-06-07 06:19||WubTheCaptain||New Issue|
|2020-06-07 20:53||Pol M||Note Added: 0021390|
|2020-06-07 20:54||Pol M||Status||new => feedback|