MantisBT - Zandronum
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0002572Zandronum[All Projects] Bugpublic2016-01-11 04:572016-01-12 01:14
ReporterTribeam3rd 
Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityunable to reproduce
StatusclosedResolutionno change required 
PlatformMicrosoftOSWindowsOS VersionXP/Vista/7
Product Version3.0-beta 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0002572: Odd behaviour with pukename online.
DescriptionI honestly don't know how to report on this one, I tried to make a test wad but couldn't reproduce it, seems specific to my main mod.

I have it setup so that a key bind calls "pukename <name>" for a vote kinda thing.

However it seem the server never runs this script, cept under certain names?

If I rename the script to "a" it works both online and offline.
If I rename the script to "s" it works in single player and not online.

If I have to take a wild and uneducated stab in the dark I'd say the fact my mod has a shit-ton of named scripts might be a cause.

Steps To ReproduceI have no idea.
Additional Information
TagsNo tags attached.
Relationships
Attached Files
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
2016-01-11 04:57Tribeam3rdNew Issue
2016-01-11 22:07Torr SamahoNote Added: 0014069
2016-01-12 00:28Tribeam3rdNote Added: 0014070
2016-01-12 01:12Tribeam3rdNote Added: 0014071
2016-01-12 01:14DuskNote Added: 0014072
2016-01-12 01:14DuskStatusnew => closed
2016-01-12 01:14DuskResolutionopen => no change required

Notes
(0014069)
Torr Samaho   
2016-01-11 22:07   
Can you run the console command 'dumpacsnetids' on client and server, and check whether the indices are the same on both when your mod is loaded?
(0014070)
Tribeam3rd   
2016-01-12 00:28   
Client Wasn't saving the log file for some reason, so here are some screens instead:

with script name "s":'https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49758621/netids.png [^]'

with script name "A":'https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49758621/netids2.png [^]'
(0014071)
Tribeam3rd   
2016-01-12 01:12   
Nevermind, turns out I had a older version of Zandronum 3.0, which I thought was the latest, then I had like 4 different people suggest 4 different other version until I finally got the right one heh.

With the version at'http://zandronum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=6792 [^]'
this seems to be fixed.
(0014072)
Dusk   
2016-01-12 01:14   
My guess is that 67f99bb8dc34 took care of this one.