Notes |
|
(0011028)
|
Zalewa
|
2014-12-02 23:10
|
|
I leave this here as an idea open for a discussion. Would something like that be useful? |
|
|
(0011033)
|
Blzut3
|
2014-12-03 01:08
|
|
Sure, it could be useful. In general though it's not a huge issue. Although I haven't got a clue what's up with chocolate doom.
I usually hear this kind of idea brought up around transition periods (some people panic when a certain population have trouble comprehending the concept of an upgrade). To a point, I do wonder how feasible it would be to have Doomseeker be a central hub and "forgo" having people set up their source ports. That is have Doomseeker act as a package manager for everything Doom.
Possibly related to 0001961? |
|
|
(0020459)
|
Pol M
|
2019-03-26 18:31
|
|
I'd say that this ticket is covered by 0001961, and I'd say that it's more comfortable by the end-user to simply let doomseeker handle everything. Also, since the clients are still accessible in their prefered location, they can use them there to play offline. It kinda is a better implementation than making the user manually enter client paths and keeping track of what client is which. Maybe not worth implementing? |
|