Notes |
|
(0004820)
|
Blzut3
|
2012-09-27 01:09
|
|
|
|
(0004824)
|
Qent
|
2012-09-27 04:15
(edited on: 2012-09-27 04:18) |
|
|
|
(0004828)
|
Blzut3
|
2012-09-27 18:32
|
|
'http://dev.mybb.com/issues/2110 [^]'
I don't think I can fully fix the issue, but I changed the regex so that it's more difficult to trigger. "LIMIT ([0-9]+),(?:[ ]+)?([0-9]+)" In other words to trigger now you need the word "limit" followed by a space, followed by a number, followed by a comma, followed by optionally any number of spaces, followed by another number. Before "limit <number>, " was enough. |
|
|
(0004897)
|
Qent
|
2012-10-01 15:57
|
|
Thanks. Is there some feature that it's backing, that would be useful to know about? |
|
|
(0004904)
|
Blzut3
|
2012-10-01 21:37
|
|
What do you mean? All forum database queries pass through that regular expression, so just avoid the phrase "limit number, number" and it should be fine. |
|
|
(0005047)
|
Qent
|
2012-10-07 23:56
|
|
What I mean is, is there something useful that we would want to use "limit number, number" for? |
|
|
(0005052)
|
Blzut3
|
2012-10-08 18:10
|
|
No. That's why I'm telling you to avoid the phrase.
It will trigger the bug on the forums as before. The only difference is it's restricted only to that specific phrase now. |
|
|
(0007285)
|
Dusk
|
2013-09-27 10:59
|
|
|
|
(0007296)
|
Blzut3
|
2013-09-29 05:16
|
|
Right, although if there hasn't been any one triggering my version of the fix. I don't really see a reason to back port the official fix until 1.6.11 comes out. |
|
|
|
The forum software change invalidated this issue. It can now be closed.
This seemes to have been fixed anyway. |
|