Zandronum 2.0

News and events are posted here. Threads also show up in the Latest News section.
User avatar
Vincent(PDP)
Forum Regular
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:35 pm
Location: Sweden
Clan: My DOOM site
Clan Tag: <MDS>
Contact:

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#81

Post by Vincent(PDP) » Sun Apr 12, 2015 8:20 pm

Torr Samaho wrote: I raised the internal limit on the script numbers, here is a testing binary. While this is still not intended to support named scripts, it is intended to make 2.x accept mods that worked in 1.3. This version also doesn't seem to crash on nextmap with your example wad. BTW: Mentioning the nextmap crash was very helpful. It showed that I needed to do more changes than I initially expected.

Still, this needs thorough testing. I can't guarantee that there are no side effcts of this change.
I've tried it real quick with named ENTER and OPEN scripts. Yet it seems to work pretty fine. :)
//Visual Vincent ( Vincent (PDP) )
- My DOOM site Team

My projects:
Spoiler: (Open)
Doom Writer
Escape From The Laboratory - Done
Escape From The Laboratory Part 2
Parkskolan Zombie Horde Map (ZM10) - Done
In game Admin Commands for Zandronum.
Achievement Mod for Zandronum
Stats mod

Drakeman1234
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:56 pm

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#82

Post by Drakeman1234 » Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:57 am

Torr Samaho wrote:
Watermelon wrote: I don't think its fully ready yet. Theres some issues with the DB that are being ironed out right now. I think Alex is looking into it (but I could be wrong).
The account system itself is ready, but we still don't have a proper GUI / front-end to log in. That's why we aren't hosting an official auth server yet.
Ahhhh. I guess we'll all know when that does happen. I'll stave off my growing anticipation until then.

User avatar
Hypnotoad
Retired Staff / Community Team Member
Posts: 528
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 8:50 pm
Location: Britland

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#83

Post by Hypnotoad » Sun Apr 19, 2015 2:50 pm

Drakeman1234 wrote:
Torr Samaho wrote:
Watermelon wrote: I don't think its fully ready yet. Theres some issues with the DB that are being ironed out right now. I think Alex is looking into it (but I could be wrong).
The account system itself is ready, but we still don't have a proper GUI / front-end to log in. That's why we aren't hosting an official auth server yet.
Ahhhh. I guess we'll all know when that does happen. I'll stave off my growing anticipation until then.
I'm not sure one of your original questions was answered properly, you asked:

" And I don't quite understand how to have the server use the auth server."

To use one of the several unofficial auth servers, you just need to use the 'authhostname' parameter, and ask the host for the address to point to. There are auth servers on Funcrusher and Grandvoid.

gjk-23__
New User
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 8:13 pm

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#84

Post by gjk-23__ » Thu Apr 23, 2015 10:30 pm

Torr Samaho wrote: I raised the internal limit on the script numbers, here is a testing binary. While this is still not intended to support named scripts, it is intended to make 2.x accept mods that worked in 1.3. This version also doesn't seem to crash on nextmap with your example wad. BTW: Mentioning the nextmap crash was very helpful. It showed that I needed to do more changes than I initially expected.

Still, this needs thorough testing. I can't guarantee that there are no side effcts of this change.
Thank you! I am one of these people who do not want a script limit. I also tested 2.1 and it works flawlessly for me so far. Fix this for the next 2.1 update. Please consider NOT putting a script limit in future updates! :biggrin:
Last edited by gjk-23__ on Thu Apr 23, 2015 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sean
IRC Operator
Posts: 951
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:09 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#85

Post by Sean » Fri Apr 24, 2015 6:29 am

gjk-23__ wrote:
Torr Samaho wrote: I raised the internal limit on the script numbers, here is a testing binary. While this is still not intended to support named scripts, it is intended to make 2.x accept mods that worked in 1.3. This version also doesn't seem to crash on nextmap with your example wad. BTW: Mentioning the nextmap crash was very helpful. It showed that I needed to do more changes than I initially expected.

Still, this needs thorough testing. I can't guarantee that there are no side effcts of this change.
Thank you! I am one of these people who do not want a script limit. I also tested 2.1 and it works flawlessly for me so far. Fix this for the next 2.1 update. Please consider NOT putting a script limit in future updates! :biggrin:
Zandronum 2.X only properly supports script numbers up to 999.
However, 3.X should support numbers up to 32767.
<capodecima> i dont say any more word without my loyer jenova

User avatar
ibm5155
Addicted to Zandronum
Posts: 1641
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:32 pm
Location: Somewhere, over the rainbow

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#86

Post by ibm5155 » Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:38 pm

supporting 32767 should be fine, but why not 65536? (are these 32769 scripts reserved to named scripts?)

EDIT: Still 999 scirpts is a fine number, but a 16bits number would be nioce too
Last edited by ibm5155 on Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Projects
Cursed Maze: DONE, V2.0
Zombie Horde - ZM09 map update: [3/15/13]
Need help with English? Then you've come to the right place!

<this post is proof of "Decline">

Lollipop
Zandrone
Posts: 1123
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:34 am
Location: Denmark

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#87

Post by Lollipop » Fri Apr 24, 2015 7:58 pm

A switch can bump the number of scripts you can stuff into one script number, so the problem isn't that huge?
Spoiler: Modding Qualifications (Open)
ACS: If it's of ridiculous scope and of suicide-inducing complexity then it's the thing for me.
DECORATE: I can make more or less any godawful hack I need. Doesn't mean it works, though.
Maps: I only map for testing ACS.
GFX: Not enough time or experience.

If you need help, advice or similar, feel free to send me a PM. ;)
Spoiler: My Current Projects (Open)
> ZMemory
> Various undeveloped ideas. (This one is an immutable fact)
Combinebobnt wrote:i can see the forum league is taking off much better than the ctf ones
GalactusToday at 1:07 PM
are you getting uncomfortable jap
feeling something happen down there

User avatar
Dark-Assassin
Maintenence Crew
Posts: 968
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 4:25 am

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#88

Post by Dark-Assassin » Sat Apr 25, 2015 1:13 am

Switch statements can be really handy. IMO people should learn to pass arguments and use switch statements than have a script for every little thing and require more than 999.

I've tried to use scripts past 999, but 10-20% of the time, it would crash with no exception.

User avatar
Kara Kurt
Frequent Poster Miles card holder
Posts: 887
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:58 pm
Location: Strasbourg, France
Contact:

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#89

Post by Kara Kurt » Sat Apr 25, 2015 1:40 am

Dark-Assassin wrote: Switch statements can be really handy. IMO people should learn to pass arguments and use switch statements than have a script for every little thing and require more than 999.
Exactly...

Ultimate Freedoomer
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 10:45 pm
Location: Staten Island
Contact:

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#90

Post by Ultimate Freedoomer » Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:45 pm

Any chance of minor releases seeing althud features that aren't in ZDoom itself?

SparkerBoy
New User
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:36 pm

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#91

Post by SparkerBoy » Sat May 02, 2015 10:39 am

line horizon is not in zandronum, i've noticed that.

User avatar
Sean
IRC Operator
Posts: 951
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:09 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#92

Post by Sean » Sat May 02, 2015 1:08 pm

SparkerBoy wrote: line horizon is not in zandronum, i've noticed that.
It is, line action 9.
<capodecima> i dont say any more word without my loyer jenova

Catastrophe
Retired Staff / Community Team Member
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:44 am

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#93

Post by Catastrophe » Sat May 02, 2015 3:52 pm

ibm5155 wrote: supporting 32767 should be fine, but why not 65536? (are these 32769 scripts reserved to named scripts?)

EDIT: Still 999 scirpts is a fine number, but a 16bits number would be nioce too
It is 65535.

Skrell
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:52 am

RE: Zandronum 2.0

#94

Post by Skrell » Sun May 31, 2015 9:31 pm

Torr Samaho wrote:
Torr Samaho wrote: I raised the internal limit on the script numbers, here is a testing binary.
No feedback? Does this mean the demand for high script numbers was greatly exaggerated or did just nobody notice the testing binary since I didn't make a separate thread for it?
I also NEED this fix so thank you as without it i kept getting the 999 error and crashes! I don't want to lose my fav mods from 1.3 and now everything seems to work as expected so thank you very much!!

Post Reply