I've tried it real quick with named ENTER and OPEN scripts. Yet it seems to work pretty fine. :)Torr Samaho wrote: I raised the internal limit on the script numbers, here is a testing binary. While this is still not intended to support named scripts, it is intended to make 2.x accept mods that worked in 1.3. This version also doesn't seem to crash on nextmap with your example wad. BTW: Mentioning the nextmap crash was very helpful. It showed that I needed to do more changes than I initially expected.
Still, this needs thorough testing. I can't guarantee that there are no side effcts of this change.
Zandronum 2.0
- Vincent(PDP)
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:35 pm
- Location: Sweden
- Clan: My DOOM site
- Clan Tag: <MDS>
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum 2.0
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:56 pm
RE: Zandronum 2.0
Ahhhh. I guess we'll all know when that does happen. I'll stave off my growing anticipation until then.Torr Samaho wrote:The account system itself is ready, but we still don't have a proper GUI / front-end to log in. That's why we aren't hosting an official auth server yet.Watermelon wrote: I don't think its fully ready yet. Theres some issues with the DB that are being ironed out right now. I think Alex is looking into it (but I could be wrong).
- Hypnotoad
- Retired Staff / Community Team Member
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 8:50 pm
- Location: Britland
RE: Zandronum 2.0
I'm not sure one of your original questions was answered properly, you asked:Drakeman1234 wrote:Ahhhh. I guess we'll all know when that does happen. I'll stave off my growing anticipation until then.Torr Samaho wrote:The account system itself is ready, but we still don't have a proper GUI / front-end to log in. That's why we aren't hosting an official auth server yet.Watermelon wrote: I don't think its fully ready yet. Theres some issues with the DB that are being ironed out right now. I think Alex is looking into it (but I could be wrong).
" And I don't quite understand how to have the server use the auth server."
To use one of the several unofficial auth servers, you just need to use the 'authhostname' parameter, and ask the host for the address to point to. There are auth servers on Funcrusher and Grandvoid.
RE: Zandronum 2.0
Thank you! I am one of these people who do not want a script limit. I also tested 2.1 and it works flawlessly for me so far. Fix this for the next 2.1 update. Please consider NOT putting a script limit in future updates!Torr Samaho wrote: I raised the internal limit on the script numbers, here is a testing binary. While this is still not intended to support named scripts, it is intended to make 2.x accept mods that worked in 1.3. This version also doesn't seem to crash on nextmap with your example wad. BTW: Mentioning the nextmap crash was very helpful. It showed that I needed to do more changes than I initially expected.
Still, this needs thorough testing. I can't guarantee that there are no side effcts of this change.
Last edited by gjk-23__ on Thu Apr 23, 2015 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RE: Zandronum 2.0
Zandronum 2.X only properly supports script numbers up to 999.gjk-23__ wrote:Thank you! I am one of these people who do not want a script limit. I also tested 2.1 and it works flawlessly for me so far. Fix this for the next 2.1 update. Please consider NOT putting a script limit in future updates!Torr Samaho wrote: I raised the internal limit on the script numbers, here is a testing binary. While this is still not intended to support named scripts, it is intended to make 2.x accept mods that worked in 1.3. This version also doesn't seem to crash on nextmap with your example wad. BTW: Mentioning the nextmap crash was very helpful. It showed that I needed to do more changes than I initially expected.
Still, this needs thorough testing. I can't guarantee that there are no side effcts of this change.
However, 3.X should support numbers up to 32767.
<capodecima> i dont say any more word without my loyer jenova
- ibm5155
- Addicted to Zandronum
- Posts: 1641
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:32 pm
- Location: Somewhere, over the rainbow
RE: Zandronum 2.0
supporting 32767 should be fine, but why not 65536? (are these 32769 scripts reserved to named scripts?)
EDIT: Still 999 scirpts is a fine number, but a 16bits number would be nioce too
EDIT: Still 999 scirpts is a fine number, but a 16bits number would be nioce too
Last edited by ibm5155 on Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Projects
Cursed Maze: DONE, V2.0
Zombie Horde - ZM09 map update: [3/15/13]
Need help with English? Then you've come to the right place!
<this post is proof of "Decline">
Cursed Maze: DONE, V2.0
Zombie Horde - ZM09 map update: [3/15/13]
Need help with English? Then you've come to the right place!
<this post is proof of "Decline">
RE: Zandronum 2.0
A switch can bump the number of scripts you can stuff into one script number, so the problem isn't that huge?
- Dark-Assassin
- Maintenence Crew
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 4:25 am
RE: Zandronum 2.0
Switch statements can be really handy. IMO people should learn to pass arguments and use switch statements than have a script for every little thing and require more than 999.
I've tried to use scripts past 999, but 10-20% of the time, it would crash with no exception.
I've tried to use scripts past 999, but 10-20% of the time, it would crash with no exception.
- Kara Kurt
- Frequent Poster Miles card holder
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:58 pm
- Location: Strasbourg, France
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum 2.0
Exactly...Dark-Assassin wrote: Switch statements can be really handy. IMO people should learn to pass arguments and use switch statements than have a script for every little thing and require more than 999.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 10:45 pm
- Location: Staten Island
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum 2.0
Any chance of minor releases seeing althud features that aren't in ZDoom itself?
-
- New User
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:36 pm
RE: Zandronum 2.0
line horizon is not in zandronum, i've noticed that.
RE: Zandronum 2.0
It is, line action 9.SparkerBoy wrote: line horizon is not in zandronum, i've noticed that.
<capodecima> i dont say any more word without my loyer jenova
-
- Retired Staff / Community Team Member
- Posts: 2559
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:44 am
RE: Zandronum 2.0
It is 65535.ibm5155 wrote: supporting 32767 should be fine, but why not 65536? (are these 32769 scripts reserved to named scripts?)
EDIT: Still 999 scirpts is a fine number, but a 16bits number would be nioce too
RE: Zandronum 2.0
I also NEED this fix so thank you as without it i kept getting the 999 error and crashes! I don't want to lose my fav mods from 1.3 and now everything seems to work as expected so thank you very much!!Torr Samaho wrote:No feedback? Does this mean the demand for high script numbers was greatly exaggerated or did just nobody notice the testing binary since I didn't make a separate thread for it?Torr Samaho wrote: I raised the internal limit on the script numbers, here is a testing binary.