Where on BE have we ever forced people to make an account to play on the servers (keyword: playing, not hosting)?Monsterovich wrote: SUDDENLY AND FINALLY.
Good job! Yeah, these sqlite databases (!) and new ACS commands would be useful, but...
I know that some servers will force you to register. Since this day... Welcome to Zdaenum!- The new CVAR sv_forcelogintojoin (default false) can prevent unauthenticated players from joining the game (they can still connect as spectators).
And as a result you'll get something like this...
REGISTER OR GTFOEnjoy!
REGISTER OR GTFO
Zandronum 1.3
-
- Zandrone
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:07 pm
- Location: Rwanda
RE: Zandronum 1.3
-
- New User
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 3:39 pm
- Location: Tx
RE: Zandronum 1.3
I'm not sure if I understand the optional user account thing. Can someone explain how it would work to me in terms that even a complete computer illiterate moron can understand?
- Monsterovich
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:46 pm
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Not yet, but in future...Watermelon wrote: Where on BE have we ever forced people to make an account to play on the servers (keyword: playing, not hosting)?
-
- Zandrone
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:07 pm
- Location: Rwanda
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Why do you think BE would do this in the future?Monsterovich wrote:Not yet, but in future...Watermelon wrote: Where on BE have we ever forced people to make an account to play on the servers (keyword: playing, not hosting)?
It's still in the testing phases, I believe you can log into a server from the command line, so your client will somehow authenticate with the server your connecting to -- which proves you are who you say you are (for the most part unless you get hacked).Suiseiseki wrote: I'm not sure if I understand the optional user account thing. Can someone explain how it would work to me in terms that even a complete computer illiterate moron can understand?
This would allow a server to save your stats/weapons/points/whatever between sessions and allow you to pick up where you left off without someone pretending to be you.
Right now... as I said: still in the testing phase. 1.4 or 2.0 will have a more streamlined approach.
Last edited by Watermelon on Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Hell yes!
Won't update for a bit until servers do.
Won't update for a bit until servers do.
<capodecima> i dont say any more word without my loyer jenova
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Thanks for reply, I would definitely try it with client on my own machine but can't do that with zandronum-server unfortunately. I've tried it before, but without linux kernel module enabled on my host I can't do much. Tried forcing it anyway but I got missing dependencies and ELF interpreters.Klofkac wrote: FreeBSD should be binary compatibile with Linux binaries. You can try running the Linux version.
Last edited by mard on Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Zandrone
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:07 pm
- Location: Rwanda
RE: Zandronum 1.3
mard wrote:Thanks for reply, I would definitely try it with client on my own machine but can't do that with zandronum-server unfortunately. I've tried it before, but without linux kernel module enabled I can't do much. Tried forcing it anyway but I got missing dependencies and ELF interpreters.Klofkac wrote: FreeBSD should be binary compatibile with Linux binaries. You can try running the Linux version.
Is it possible to compile it?
- Monsterovich
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:46 pm
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Yes, but server-only. (using -DSERVERONLY flag or something like that)Watermelon wrote:mard wrote:Thanks for reply, I would definitely try it with client on my own machine but can't do that with zandronum-server unfortunately. I've tried it before, but without linux kernel module enabled I can't do much. Tried forcing it anyway but I got missing dependencies and ELF interpreters.Klofkac wrote: FreeBSD should be binary compatibile with Linux binaries. You can try running the Linux version.
Is it possible to compile it?
Heh, I hope this won't happen.Watermelon wrote: Why do you think BE would do this in the future?
[spoiler]Do you really want to know what I think?
[spoiler]
Don't click it again.
[spoiler]Becuz most of bestever admins are stupid, seriosly.[/spoiler]
[/spoiler]
[/spoiler]
Last edited by Monsterovich on Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Decided to give it a try, and guess what. It actually compiled with no problems.Monsterovich wrote:Yes, but server-only. (using -DSERVERONLY flag or something like that)Watermelon wrote:Is it possible to compile it?mard wrote:Thanks for reply, I would definitely try it with client on my own machine but can't do that with zandronum-server unfortunately. I've tried it before, but without linux kernel module enabled I can't do much. Tried forcing it anyway but I got missing dependencies and ELF interpreters.Klofkac wrote: FreeBSD should be binary compatibile with Linux binaries. You can try running the Linux version.
I used this repo and this wiki guide, if anyone's interested.
Thanks for help!
- Disguise
- Retired Staff / Community Team Member
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 10:00 pm
- Location: Romania
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Yeeeeesssssssss! All your hard work is appreciated guys! Thanks for the new version!
- Kara Kurt
- Frequent Poster Miles card holder
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:58 pm
- Location: Strasbourg, France
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Dude, in the account system and user stats thread they've clearly and several times stated that the account system will be optional. Why do you mind anyway?Monsterovich wrote:
Heh, I hope this won't happen.
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Found the issue, the authentication hostname can only be set on server boot. Changing it mid-run has no effect.Torr Samaho wrote:Are you sure that you're using an auth server compatible with the 7/6/2014 version of the protocol? Try "authhostname zandroauthtest.oscillicious.com:16666". This one works fine for me. You can create an account with the link in the first post.Jenova wrote: Good work, but unless I am missing something, logging in to the auth server doesn't actually seem to do anything (from in-game).Strange. Switching to 16666 works fine for me, see above.AlexMax wrote: There's something amiss with the port number interpretation of the cvar. Until a serverside fix is released, if you omit the port number completely and change the port of charonauth to 15301, it should work.
Maybe this is a good thing? After all, we can only get people's username, if anybody can switch the authentication server out from under the server it might confuse mods or other admins. I'll continue the conversation in a bug.
Last edited by AlexMax on Mon Oct 06, 2014 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The only limit to my freedom is the inevitable closure of the
universe, as inevitable as your own last breath. And yet,
there remains time to create, to create, and escape.
Escape will make me God.
universe, as inevitable as your own last breath. And yet,
there remains time to create, to create, and escape.
Escape will make me God.
RE: Zandronum 1.3
I love baseless speculation!!!Monsterovich wrote:Not yet, but in future...Watermelon wrote: Where on BE have we ever forced people to make an account to play on the servers (keyword: playing, not hosting)?
In addition to requiring all users to register, you will also need to link your Facebook, Google+, and Twitter accounts to connect to BE servers.
Once users have linked the three aforementioned social websites to their respective BE account, users will be presented with the option to sign up for a mandatory monthly subscription to play on BE servers (Bronze which allows 2 hours of playtime a day at $4.99, silver which allows 4 hours of playtime at $8.99, and gold which allows 8 hours of playtime for $13.99).
After users have selected one of our BE Premium™ plans, they will be able to experience the full entertainment suite that Zandronum has to offer!
Remember to disregard the fact that we've provided community based servers for two years without asking for anything in return! Also, don't forget to deny that BE is actually open source, so you could host your own! Oh that's right, you don't actually care though, so it doesn't matter!
Last edited by Jenova on Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:17 am
- Location: Somewhere in the future
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Rofl, and i tried make it simplier as possible for a connect sound without losing a futuristic feeling.Zeberpal wrote: * Zeberpal felt in the eternal journey of changemus sounds/cnnctsnd.ogg
- Tiger
- Retired Staff / Community Team Member
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 6:21 am
- Location: United States
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Jenova wrote: I love baseless speculation!!!
In addition to requiring all users to register, you will also need to link your Facebook, Google+, and Twitter accounts to connect to BE servers.
Once users have linked the three aforementioned social websites to their respective BE account, users will be presented with the option to sign up for a mandatory monthly subscription to play on BE servers (Bronze which allows 2 hours of playtime a day at $4.99, silver which allows 4 hours of playtime at $8.99, and gold which allows 8 hours of playtime for $13.99).
After users have selected one of our BE Premium™ plans, they will be able to experience the full entertainment suite that Zandronum has to offer!
Why not Free-to-Play? It's the biggest money making scheme today! Want to pick up that Rocket Launcher? You must pay $1.50 or wait 14 hours in real time! Want to advanced to the next map? You must pay $1.85 or wait 48 hours in real time!
My heart sank a bit on making this post....
Nicholas 'Tiger' Gautier
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:56 pm
RE: Zandronum 1.3
YES!
FINALLY.
Can't wait for Wrath of Cronos RPG to get updated!
FINALLY.
Can't wait for Wrath of Cronos RPG to get updated!
- haxmurderer
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:13 pm
RE: Zandronum 1.3
I think I figured this one out. I was having the same problem, but I was setting the authhostname AFTER my Zandronum server was started, which doesn't appear to work.Torr Samaho wrote:Are you sure that you're using an auth server compatible with the 7/6/2014 version of the protocol? Try "authhostname zandroauthtest.oscillicious.com:16666". This one works fine for me. You can create an account with the link in the first post.Jenova wrote: Good work, but unless I am missing something, logging in to the auth server doesn't actually seem to do anything (from in-game).Strange. Switching to 16666 works fine for me, see above.AlexMax wrote: There's something amiss with the port number interpretation of the cvar. Until a serverside fix is released, if you omit the port number completely and change the port of charonauth to 15301, it should work.
If I start the Zandronum server with "+authhostname zandroauthtest.oscillicious.com:16666 +sv_forcelogintojoin 1", then it works.... !
Edit: .... aaaaaaand I just refreshed and saw AlexMax beat me to it. :)
Last edited by haxmurderer on Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Oh fuck yes! Can't wait to try it! Of course I'll let you know if there's any bug.
Will you merge this version plus the ZDoom updates?
Will you merge this version plus the ZDoom updates?
[quote=The Forum Community] We all love you, Quaker540.[/quote]
-
- Zandrone
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:07 pm
- Location: Rwanda
RE: Zandronum 1.3
Yes, that's for 2.0Quaker540 wrote: Oh fuck yes! Can't wait to try it! Of course I'll let you know if there's any bug.
Will you merge this version plus the ZDoom updates?