Conclusion

[Dragon]

With this we'd like to thank all the participants for this season's ZDC!

We hope you all enjoyed playing as much as we did enjoy organizing.

With this, the ZDC-gang once again says:
Over and Out! Good games everybody!

P.S. Stay tuned for next season!

Quick recap of this season's winners:
________________________________________________

Division 1 - 1st: Fluffles | 2nd: Xaver | 3rd: Sinistr
Division 2 - 1st: Jwarrier | 2nd: HTG | 3rd: Combinebobnt
Division 3 - 1st: D'sparil | 2nd: Wirtualnosc | 3rd: IdeIdoom
Division 4 - 1st: one_Two | 2nd: Mazter[Qyou] | 3rd: NONE

[one_Two]

Imo in future tournaments the winner of one group within each division should play the runner up of the other in the same division, to make better finals. Good tournament though.

[Dragon]

Imo in future tournaments the winner of one group within each division should play the runner up of the other in the same division, to make better finals. Good tournament though.

Then it defeats the purpose of divisions.

Also the no other finalist would stand a chance to the finalist in D1.

[one_Two]

Imo in future tournaments the winner of one group within each division should play the runner up of the other in the same division, to make better finals. Good tournament though.

Then it defeats the purpose of divisions.

Also the no other finalist would stand a chance to the finalist in D1.

re-read what I done typed.

[Dragon]

Imo in future tournaments the winner of one group within each division should play the runner up of the other in the same division, to make better finals. Good tournament though.

But it already is like this basically? Or am I missing something here..?

[Lollipop]

well, if you are dumb, then I am too, cuz I dont get the point either?

[one_Two]

Well I explained it to Drag and he wasn't having it. What I mean is atm the top two places of each group (a and b) play a random person from the other group in the semis . Here is an example from division 2:

"The finalists of Divison 2 are the following:
Spider
HTG
Jwarrier
Combinebobnt"

2A finished:
1st: Spider - 8 (3): Advanced
2nd: HTG - 6 (3): Advanced

2B finished:
1st: Jwarrier - 9 (3): Advanced
2nd: Combinebobnt - 5 (3): Advanced

In my opinion the semi-finals should be:

Spider V Combinebobnt
Jwarrier V HTG

However the current system makes no difference whether you come first or second, so we get:

HTG V Combinebobnt
Jwarrier V Spider

To me this just seems stupid and means the final isn't between the best players. Dragon says it is like, well if they got to the final they are the best, but that argument is stupid because a first placed player HAS to go out when they both play each other. Personaly I think the system I've shown would be better, just my opinion though, tell me what you think.

[Wirtualnosc]

Yeah, I have to agree there. Your system looks better IMO... But mostly because it would make finals more spectacular.

[Nati46]

I agree with this too. Would like to see what Legion and Dragon have to say about this.
Edit: tbh I am pretty sure that the concept of assigning top players to different matches has already been done in previous tournaments, not sure about the 2 recent ones though.

[one_Two]

When's the next tounament?