Qent wrote:
Samsara was amazing, as always.
From testing and actually playing Hysteric CTF in FNF, we thought that the maps looked relatively good and played well; but what I'm hearing now is that every one of them sucked. We would appreciate some more detailed feedback.
As I had already told to you on IRC, the maps are very lackluster. They were all very flat, the architecture was almost non-existant and the texturing was very, very bland and clashed in a few places (mostly the green-grey combos in some). Not to forget that the gimmicks (demon spawns in Map05, Z-Gravity in that other one, conveyor belt) felt just downright terrible due to the execution.
Code: Select all
[15:47:10] <@Qent> hysteric pales in comparison to idl2013?
[15:47:13] <Hybrid> yes
[15:48:44] <@Qent> map01, 04, 05, 29, and 31 all have big open areas O.o
[15:58:30] <@Qent> zdctf11 is not too big an open area, and map03, 08, 20, and 28 do not have problematic weapon placement?
And, really, the fact that you completely forgot that these maps are far better than HCTF ones and have a metric ton of more flow in comparision makes it seem like you have a very serious problem with knowing how much quality is in each FNF "candidate".
EDIT:
Code: Select all
[15:22:13] <@Qent> all maps were tested
[15:22:23] <@Qent> are you talking about map01?
[15:22:34] <Hybrid> [15:21:41] <@Qent> which i added in later but never got played
[15:22:51] <@Qent> never got played for fnf
I almost forgot about this part. So, what did really happen with the testing?