Ru5tK1ng wrote:The state of the compet scene is bad and me telling others how bad it is and to not invest time into it isn't spreading negativity.
We all know that the scene is bad, but why discourage people that genuinely want to help by telling them to forget it? It's like telling people to ignore a fire that has been started only because it's already caused significant damage.
Ru5tK1ng wrote:Time is one of the most valuable things that you cannot get back. I'm spreading the word/truth so people don't waste their time for a fruitless cause.
I can sympathise with feeling that others shouldn't "waste" their time on something you once worked on and didn't work out, but it isn't fair to eagerly dismiss their efforts, especially seeing as how some of the ideas I've read here were actually quite good.
Ru5tK1ng wrote:Also, if I'm a such a bother to others, they can tell me themselves or ignore me. They don't need you to fight their battles for them, Mr. Knight of the Round table.
The clueless new player wouldn't know better though. Well, not like there will be any eventually, if you guys keep up this negative nancy act for long.
Ru5tK1ng wrote:You just basically admitted it has less to do with the compet scene and more to do with you wanting people to stop posting their 'toxic' messages because you don't like said messages.
Just because I'm arguing on my own and you and your friends gang up to argue with me literally every time I show my face here
still doesn't mean this is my problem alone. Those messages are definitely unpleasant to read (and why wouldn't they be?), but would it kill to at least allow (or perhaps even encourage? *gasp*) people to do things they want to do?
All I'm doing is saying "ok, maybe y'all need to stop telling people that Doom is dead even if it LOOKS dead to you because maybe they would be more motivated to participate in the scene that way", but you idiots would rather waste your time calling me a hypocrite, a horrible person, among other kinds of bad while proudly restating your rights to perpetuate your own toxic behaviour (because apparently having the most basic degree of respect and politeness is just being out-of-touch with the reality of this forum) INSTEAD of confronting my ideas alone or coming up with better thoughts. The lot of you are always reducing my arguments down to "Soul being a contrarian dumbass again", which inevitably leads to a thread lock by an admin who's vehemently repulsed by drama and nothing ever actually gets addressed -- seen this happen quite a few times and it's unironically sad. And yet some of you are confused as to why people are hesitant to even share their thoughts and discuss in threads like these.
Combinebobnt wrote:yes soul the pvp scene of hundreds of people died because a few proactive individuals weren't proactive. it is all their fault for not helping the scene stay alive while they helped the scene stay alive. glad you were able to finally figure this out for us. thank you and god bless
Missed the point a little. It's not that proactive individuals don't feel like being proactive, but rather, they are being told by "wiser" people that they shouldn't be. That's what I have a problem with in the first place.
Mobius wrote:Is this another "soul needs to fight A3 over something" again?
A quick timestamp check reveals that the thread was relatively inactive until I reared my ugly head, after which you and your goons provided me with the typical knee-jerk passive-aggressive replies. But that's fine, I just hope whoever else reads this thread understands that this is really the opposite of what you just said here.
Mobius wrote:What's with this guy and his need to argue a point and then be wrong at it eventually or during.
What's with this guy and his need to say what he thinks?! And things I disagree with? UGH!!
Mobius wrote:This topic isn't about you and restoring the scene so this topic was derailed by you when Razor started this thread necromancy.
My first reply to Rust was actually reasonably on-topic. Not that you'd know though, since you're only here to beef with me and tell me about IDL, Anna, etc. for the millionth time. This play's gotten stale years ago.
Mobius wrote:Such as?
Good ideas and projects can go a long way towards growth and maintenance in the community.
Mobius wrote:That's TWO entirely contradictory sentiments in one point you simpleton. If he wanted it to die why would he want to HELP grow it back? Do you even think before you post goddamn.
Nitpicking much? The intent of my statement is still evident: you guys care enough to talk about how Doom is dead so many times over, yet can't put any of that effort towards something constructive for once. Does killing Doom off for good matter that much to you?
Mobius wrote:Nigga you're inactive so who honestly gives a flying fuck what you find acceptable like what is wrong with you?
Stop acting like you own these forums, gracias.
Mobius wrote:Also spreading negativity? This isn't a fuckin` safe space
Oops, sorry for ever asking you not to behave like an infuriated drunkard who lost all his money through gambling for once. Carry on.
Mobius wrote:No but I see you in this thread like a presumptuous little fuck insisting on Rustking about what he should do to your benefit despite you having NO SKIN in the game because you are inactive in a thread about Ammar that LONG DIED.
I merely told him to cool off with the "Doom is dead, stop bothering" remarks for the betterment of everyone, but thanks for twisting my actions and intentions like that anyway.
ZzZzZz