The (G)Zdoom Question

General discussion of the port and Doom-related chat.
User avatar
Trusty McLegit
New User
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 7:50 pm
Location: Under a rock somewhere probably

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#41

Post by Trusty McLegit » Sun May 07, 2017 8:29 pm

Concerning the issue of update frequency, why not implement an automatic updater like Catastrophe suggested?

User avatar
Torr Samaho
Lead Developer
Posts: 1473
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 6:03 pm
Location: Germany

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#42

Post by Torr Samaho » Sun May 07, 2017 8:56 pm

Trusty McLegit wrote:Concerning the issue of update frequency, why not implement an automatic updater like Catastrophe suggested?
If anybody volunteers to write an auto updater that works on Windows, Linux and OS X, and can handle clients and severs, please go ahead. It would be wonderful to have such a thing, but implementing it is a lot of work and I'd personally rather spend the necessary time and effort on Zandronum itself.

User avatar
AlexMax
FNF Team
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 10:14 pm
Contact:

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#43

Post by AlexMax » Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:44 am

Torr Samaho wrote:
Trusty McLegit wrote:Concerning the issue of update frequency, why not implement an automatic updater like Catastrophe suggested?
If anybody volunteers to write an auto updater that works on Windows, Linux and OS X, and can handle clients and severs, please go ahead. It would be wonderful to have such a thing, but implementing it is a lot of work and I'd personally rather spend the necessary time and effort on Zandronum itself.
What if it was a feature of Doomseeker instead? It already can install testing releases automatically, why not stable versions too?
The only limit to my freedom is the inevitable closure of the
universe, as inevitable as your own last breath. And yet,
there remains time to create, to create, and escape.

Escape will make me God.

User avatar
Empyre
Zandrone
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 6:41 am
Location: Garland, TX, USA

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#44

Post by Empyre » Sat Jul 08, 2017 4:55 am

I like that idea. ---^
"For the world is hollow, and I have touched the sky."

User avatar
Torr Samaho
Lead Developer
Posts: 1473
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 6:03 pm
Location: Germany

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#45

Post by Torr Samaho » Sat Jul 08, 2017 11:02 am

AlexMax wrote:
Torr Samaho wrote: If anybody volunteers to write an auto updater that works on Windows, Linux and OS X, and can handle clients and severs, please go ahead. It would be wonderful to have such a thing, but implementing it is a lot of work and I'd personally rather spend the necessary time and effort on Zandronum itself.
What if it was a feature of Doomseeker instead? It already can install testing releases automatically, why not stable versions too?
I think Doomseeker could handle the clients, but not the servers.

User avatar
AlexMax
FNF Team
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 10:14 pm
Contact:

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#46

Post by AlexMax » Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:40 am

Torr Samaho wrote:
AlexMax wrote:
Torr Samaho wrote: If anybody volunteers to write an auto updater that works on Windows, Linux and OS X, and can handle clients and severs, please go ahead. It would be wonderful to have such a thing, but implementing it is a lot of work and I'd personally rather spend the necessary time and effort on Zandronum itself.
What if it was a feature of Doomseeker instead? It already can install testing releases automatically, why not stable versions too?
I think Doomseeker could handle the clients, but not the servers.
I feel like that would be best served by creating yum/deb repositories, that way you can dnf or aptitude updates onto your system.

Alternatively, it would be nice to have a static place on the website where you curl a text file with the latest stable version number, and if it's new, a static place where you can curl the latest server binary.

Other than that, as a server host, I certainly wouldn't want any sort of automatic update built into the binary itself.
The only limit to my freedom is the inevitable closure of the
universe, as inevitable as your own last breath. And yet,
there remains time to create, to create, and escape.

Escape will make me God.

User avatar
Roozy1999
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:13 am
Location: Tallahassee
Clan: Zandro-roozy
Clan Tag: 1999

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#47

Post by Roozy1999 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 8:39 pm

What happens if you don't play Zandronum? There is no multiplayer in (G)ZDoom.
The Roozies are SAVED in this FORUM! YES WE DID IT :doom:No more ZDoom Forums, No more Bullshit, No more Spamming, No more Cyber-bullying, and no more KKKAnd I'm A Fuckin' Fish.

User avatar
Empyre
Zandrone
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 6:41 am
Location: Garland, TX, USA

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#48

Post by Empyre » Wed Jul 12, 2017 10:40 pm

Roozy1999 wrote:What happens if you don't play Zandronum? There is no multiplayer in (G)ZDoom.
I think that there is multiplayer in (G)ZDoom, but it is really clumsy and awkward.
"For the world is hollow, and I have touched the sky."

User avatar
Lex Safonov
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 5:55 pm

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#49

Post by Lex Safonov » Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:06 am

Zandronum 3.0 has support interactive portals?

User avatar
Sean
Zandronum Tester
Posts: 850
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:09 pm
Location: England
Clan Tag: [TSPG]
Contact:

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#50

Post by Sean » Tue Nov 14, 2017 4:56 pm

Lex Safonov wrote:
Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:06 am
Zandronum 3.0 has support interactive portals?
No

Code: Select all

<Decay> csnxs try being less bitter and actually helpful to the community, thanks

Samuzero15tlh
Forum Regular
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: In home, sweet Home
Clan Tag: <skr>

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#51

Post by Samuzero15tlh » Thu Jan 18, 2018 8:24 pm

Im pretty worried about the comunity from the both sides, what it will happen if something goes wrong on this process?

The only thing that im sure about, If you update Zandronum to the Gzdoom updates maybe a lot of people would join to it, since we're talking about the same games don't we? In my opinion Im okay with the idea. I'll pray for the union of those 2 wonderful sourceports.

User avatar
Combinebobnt
Contributor
Posts: 1877
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:37 am
Location: Erth
Contact:

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#52

Post by Combinebobnt » Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:26 am

maybe torr and graf went into the mountains to do this and will come back when it's done? -zscript+float rewrite+whatever thats not happening soon rofl

KenFH
New User
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 7:24 pm

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#53

Post by KenFH » Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:01 am

Seems I should toss in my 2 cents here before Something Bad might possibly happen. I'd much rather see the merge reverse - GZDoom into Zandronum - with Torr and/or like-minded people deciding major releases and feature yes/nos - than this, and would quite possibly just stick with the last Zandronum if this merge in GZDoom happened. I don't keep up with GZDoom or use it to any significant degree because it has never really met my needs - I want a stable, widely compatible play and development platform, not the unreliable, new-computer-focused bleeding edge, and I've never liked Zahl's handling of such issues. So I would definitely encourage Torr and company to keep on keeping on. I can and will wait for the next Zandronum, and the wider the compatibility, and the more stable the engine, the better, no matter how overdue it may become. Were this to go-ahead anyways, I feel the QZDoom renderer should be given priority over the GZDoom one. OpenGL reliance is a limitation I don't need or want in an ID Tech 1 source port - I don't feel it's justified or worthwhile, so it's just baggage to me. And I trust Torr Samaho far more, judgement and otherwise, than I will ever trust Graf Zahl.

Congrats on finally getting 3.0 out, Torr!

User avatar
Rachael
New User
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 12:06 am

Re: The (G)Zdoom Question

#54

Post by Rachael » Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:49 pm

@KenFH: Rest assured Zandronum is going to retain its own independence no matter what happens, even when C/S is eventually implemented (and don't expect that to happen overnight, but it will happen). The existence of forks as it is on GZDoom has prevented Graf from having an absolute monopoly over the port - he only has a partial monopoly over the users, and that was earned through years of trust and goodwill (even if you refuse to believe it - the fact that people are even there speaks volumes - he's not as bad as he seems, but I won't try to deny that he has his bad moments, and when you keep your distance from someone those bad things stick out a lot more). In fact, Graf's following and loyalty from his users was earned the same way as Torr's own following - they both worked hard and earned it.

Ultimately, when Zandronum and GZDoom start sharing code with each other more frequently, I expect that what will happen is people will be loyal to the ports by name - a "brand" if you will - GZDoom users will use GZDoom and Zandronum users will use Zandronum - even in the brief moments where the codebases are otherwise exactly the same. And this is something I do not want to change. A community works for a reason - and I don't think trying to force the two to mix would do anybody any good.

Post Reply