Page 1 of 1
But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:01 pm
by Midyin
ok, So I'm trying to play Project Brutality, but it keeps crashing when I try to run the pack using Zandranum. I looked over the instructions again and it says this
Link to image (Because the image kept coming up broken when i tried to use you [IMG] tags)
Knote how it says twice that I need Zandronum 3.0 Alpha...
I have been searching all over this place and Google, but all I can find is "The latest Version 2.1.2-win", hell, the link thats on that page took me to a place where I downloaded the TOO old version.
(I won't even ask why it would link me to a version that the person that set up the link said wont work)
Where is Zandronum 3.0?
(I'm sorry if this post comes off as standoffish, but I really hate when dumb stuff like this happens. I just want to put the mods I want into Doom, and be able to get past this technical stuff and play the game. XD)
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:05 pm
by Sean
Scroll down on the downloads page. Magic, right?
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:08 pm
by Midyin
Sean wrote:Magic, right?
this is why people are mean to nerds. drop the "Elitist bullshit additude", and you'll have more friends...

Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:28 pm
by Midyin
Sean wrote:Scroll down on the downloads page. Magic, right?
HERE we see version 2.1.2 advertised as "The latests version"... thankfully if you look down threw you can see that they lied and version 3.0 is there too if you ignore what they are calling "THE LATEST VERSION" and read the small print, but i'm sure your Elitist D-bag brain will come up with a bullshit reason for how this isn't misleading for someone as super smart as you.. XD
This is why I hate Modding/gaming communities. there's always a bunch of childish cocky asshole Elitist mixed into the group that makes the communities unapproachable, so a simple question turns into an argument.
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:37 pm
by IdeIdoom
Midyin wrote:Sean wrote:Scroll down on the downloads page. Magic, right?
HERE we see version 2.1.2 advertised as "The latests version"... thankfully if you look down threw you can see that they lied and version 3.0 is there too if you ignore what they are calling "THE LATEST VERSION"
3.0 is not even released, it's under the latest development or test builds. It's not the latest stable version which is 2.1.2. Now stop sounding like you were right.
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:41 pm
by Marcaek
3.0 isn't advertised as the latest official version because it is still a beta, which means it is constantly updated and most people don't like having to download a new update every few days. Regardless if you had bothered to simply scroll down all your problems would have been solved and you wouldn't be here acting like an asshole in response to having your feelings hurt.
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:42 pm
by Slim
First of all, hello and welcome to Zandronum.
Second, the only reason 2.1.2 is the latest version at the moment is because it's the latest official release, 3.0 is still in alpha so that's technically not a lie. If you poke around the News section, you'll find the current alpha build's thread, with a download.
Midyin wrote:
Knote how it says twice that I need Zandronum 3.0 Alpha...
Midyin wrote:
"Elitist bullshit additude"
Sounds a lot like you at the moment, one (not even) bad apple and you already think the rest are just as rotten.
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:42 pm
by ZZYZX
Midyin wrote:there's always a bunch of childish cocky asshole Elitist mixed into the group that makes the communities unapproachable, so a simple question turns into an argument.
You will fit right in, human. No one else was trying to turn this into an argument. Further, your question was answered almost instantly.
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:05 pm
by Sean
Code: Select all
@TheMostlyCat | geez its not like he said 'scroll down slightly you fucking fucktard, geezus christ are you that dense'
@TheMostlyCat | (like he should have)
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:18 pm
by Catastrophe
Yeah
BRUTAL DOOM!. RIP AND TEAR!!!!
there's always a bunch of childish cocky asshole Elitist mixed into the group that makes the communities unapproachable, so a simple question turns into an argument.
Ok, leave. If u cant fuckin scroll like 2 centimers down or press ctrl+f and type in "3.0" then ur too dumb to be here anyways. aka these forums are too
BRUTAL for you to survive
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:03 pm
by Marcaek
ok guys bannedwagon over i think the point was made well enough in the first 3 replies
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:02 pm
by Midyin
IdeIdoom wrote:Midyin wrote:Sean wrote:Scroll down on the downloads page. Magic, right?
HERE we see version 2.1.2 advertised as "The latests version"... thankfully if you look down threw you can see that they lied and version 3.0 is there too if you ignore what they are calling "THE LATEST VERSION"
3.0 is not even released, it's under the latest development or test builds. It's not the latest stable version which is 2.1.2. Now stop sounding like you were right.
except i was right. see?
right here it says twice that Project Brutality NEEDS to be ran with Zandronum 3.0... so, theres that i guess. XD
Slim wrote:First of all, hello and welcome to Zandronum.
Thank you. :)
Slim wrote:Second, the only reason 2.1.2 is the latest version at the moment is because it's the latest official release, 3.0 is still in alpha so that's technically not a lie. If you poke around the News section, you'll find the current alpha build's thread, with a download.
Thank you again. I appreciate you answering my question like an adult. that was very mature of you and helpful. :)
Slim wrote:Midyin wrote:
Knote how it says twice that I need Zandronum 3.0 Alpha...
Midyin wrote:
"Elitist bullshit additude"
Sounds a lot like you at the moment, one (not even) bad apple and you already think the rest are just as rotten.
and everything was going so well... XD
I didn't say EVERYONE, just the typical number of D-bags you happen to see in every community.. lol
I know that I'm new(Fuck the new guy right?), but the bottom line is he was being a snide little bitch-boy, and I called him on his shit.
It dosent matter how New I am or how well you know him. Wrong is still wrong, and he was in the Wrong..
Sean wrote:Code: Select all
@TheMostlyCat | geez its not like he said 'scroll down slightly you fucking fucktard, geezus christ are you that dense'
@TheMostlyCat | (like he should have)
Am I dense for not liking stupid bratty attitude from E-Thugs?... How dence is some one that doesn't know how to spell Jesus?.. lol
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:42 pm
by Sean
Midyin wrote:
Sean wrote:Code: Select all
@TheMostlyCat | geez its not like he said 'scroll down slightly you fucking fucktard, geezus christ are you that dense'
@TheMostlyCat | (like he should have)
Am I dense for not liking stupid bratty attitude from E-Thugs?... How dence is some one that doesn't know how to spell Jesus?.. lol
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee I'm flying! *woosh*
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 7:36 am
by -Jes-
Midyin wrote:Am I dense for not liking stupid bratty attitude from E-Thugs?... How dence is some one that doesn't know how to spell Jesus?.. lol
1. 'Magic, right?' is hardly bratty attitude, especially when asking so little of you. Petulant deflection ('Dern Elitists') and ad hominems (brats, e-thugs), on the other hand, are the very definition of such.
2. Geezus is an intentionally flanderized adaptation of 'Jesus' as an expression of shock, not a spelling error. 'Dence' IS, however, and as such you are a hypocrite.
Next time, do the right thing. The picture you linked explicitly stated ALPHA. ALPHA being an EARLY BUILD of something. Something likely found in a larger DOWNLOADS section, as can be found on the main page. Connect the dots, flex your observational skills, and maybe, next time, you might just avoid embarrassing yourself as completely as you have here.
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 9:25 am
by Ænima
ITT:
OP overreacts to the first response he gets and decides to lash out at everyone else.
lmao
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 12:36 pm
by IdeIdoom
Midyin wrote:IdeIdoom wrote:Midyin wrote:Sean wrote:Scroll down on the downloads page. Magic, right?
HERE we see version 2.1.2 advertised as "The latests version"... thankfully if you look down threw you can see that they lied and version 3.0 is there too if you ignore what they are calling "THE LATEST VERSION"
3.0 is not even released, it's under the latest development or test builds. It's not the latest stable version which is 2.1.2. Now stop sounding like you were right.
except i was right. see?
right here it says twice that Project Brutality NEEDS to be ran with Zandronum 3.0... so, theres that i guess. XD
Of course brutal doom (almost) issue. Zandronum 3.0 is still in alpha/in testing AKA still not released AKA not the latest official version. The developers only display the latest stable version of the source port. You could also see, right in the news RIGHT BELOW THAT BUTTON, "Zandronum 3.0 alpha etc etc."
Midyin wrote:
I know that I'm new(Fuck the new guy right?),
Fuck the new guy? Nope. We're welcoming to people.
Fuck the new STUPID guy, who can't even scroll 1 or 2 times OR check the news section for that matter? Of course.
Midyin wrote:
but the bottom line is he was being a snide little bitch-boy, and I called him on his shit.
It dosent matter how New I am or how well you know him. Wrong is still wrong, and he was in the Wrong..
Instead of realizing you were kind of dumb for not looking too carefully in the downloads page, you accuse him of this shit and starting a drama thread (basically). Good job on that one.
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 1:40 pm
by HTG
Hi! first of all, welcome to zandronum
Second, you should honestly chill, seans post wasn't intended as a mock towards you, as you seem to think
Third, when confronted about it instead of arguing back you should admit you were in the wrong, plenty of others have done this in the past and admitted they confronted the situation wrong
Over-all enjoy your stay, but chill out yo :p
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 5:29 pm
by Ænima
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 8:30 pm
by Marcaek
this thread is a cesspit of irony
Re: But were is 3.0?
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 8:55 pm
by Ru5tK1ng
Usually I do not back seat mod, but it's time for this topic to die. The guy already got 3.0.