Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
So me and Kurt were talking about it, and since the Gametic binary seems to feel pretty much alot more stable when it comes to shooting and registering, we decided to create a topic to ask if it would be possible to create a new version of Zandronum, prior to 2.0 with the system in it.
This way we would be able to benefit from an already much better unlagged system while we wait for the more better settings that were promised by Water for network in 2.0.
This way we would be able to benefit from an already much better unlagged system while we wait for the more better settings that were promised by Water for network in 2.0.

-
- Frequent Poster Miles card holder
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:58 pm
- Location: Strasbourg, France
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Hope it doesn't get rushed though.
I'm aware that 2.0 will mostly be a Zdoom update and that will benefit modders, but it would still be nice to have the unlagged ready for 2.0 and give out a minimum delay if something goes wrong, even though the unlagged is doing good so far.
I'm aware that 2.0 will mostly be a Zdoom update and that will benefit modders, but it would still be nice to have the unlagged ready for 2.0 and give out a minimum delay if something goes wrong, even though the unlagged is doing good so far.
- Dark-Assassin
- Maintenence Crew
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 4:25 am
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
In case of any chance of breakage, would the old method still exist in the later builds, or be completely deprecated and eventually removed?
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Yeah indeed, it's going really good so far, so is the testing, earlier today we had a good 4v4 test server if not more.
EDIT: @Dark-Assassin I don't know really, if the gametic unlagged performs way better, the older method should really be removed since it'd be useless.
EDIT: @Dark-Assassin I don't know really, if the gametic unlagged performs way better, the older method should really be removed since it'd be useless.
Last edited by Danzoa on Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

- Combinebobnt
- Retired Staff / Community Team Member
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:37 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
It would be nicer to to just get to 2.0 already.
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Combinebobnt wrote: It would be nicer to to just get to 2.0 already.
Ijon Tichy wrote:I like how your first responses to concerns being raised was to start insulting people, accusing random people on the Internet of being Shadowfox, and digging up irrelevant shit from the past. It really inspires confidence in me that you guys are level-headed and rational folks.
<BlueCool> you guys IQ is the same as my IP, Dynamic
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Yeah that's true, but while we wait for it wouldn't it be better to just have a better unlagged system already?
Also Konar, since you're reading is it possible to host a testing server with this binary?
Also Konar, since you're reading is it possible to host a testing server with this binary?

-
- Frequent Poster Miles card holder
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:58 pm
- Location: Strasbourg, France
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Haha, ja :DDanzoa wrote: Also Konar, since you're reading is it possible to host a testing server with this binary?
It's a pain trying to convince him to host a server; so GL

Last edited by Kara Kurt on Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ibm5155
- Addicted to Zandronum
- Posts: 1641
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:32 pm
- Location: Somewhere, over the rainbow
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
it would be cool if the difference betw the gametics could be saw by a demo recording, if yes I could make both tests on a single demo (and since most of the time i have high ping it would be cool to see it xD)
Projects
Cursed Maze: DONE, V2.0
Zombie Horde - ZM09 map update: [3/15/13]
Need help with English? Then you've come to the right place!
<this post is proof of "Decline">
Cursed Maze: DONE, V2.0
Zombie Horde - ZM09 map update: [3/15/13]
Need help with English? Then you've come to the right place!
<this post is proof of "Decline">
- Torr Samaho
- Lead Developer
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 6:03 pm
- Location: Germany
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
If the general consensus is that the gametic unlagged in its current state (i.e. changeset 25679f47738ebd391ece37d839641690a442aff2) is simply better than the old ping based unlagged, I'll pull the code into the stable repo, merge it with the 2.0 repo and can make an official 2.0 beta build. Then, servers can host the 2.0 beta and all players that would like to use the new unlagged just need to activate the automatic testing feature in their launcher and can play on these servers without any further hassles. The launcher automatically switches to the correct Zandronum binary when joining the server.Danzoa wrote: So me and Kurt were talking about it, and since the Gametic binary seems to feel pretty much alot more stable when it comes to shooting and registering, we decided to create a topic to ask if it would be possible to create a new version of Zandronum, prior to 2.0 with the system in it.
Right now the clients can go back to the old method by setting cl_ping_unlagged to 1. I plan to keep this option around for a bit and eventually remove it, if we are sure that the fallback is not needed anymore.Dark-Assassin wrote: In case of any chance of breakage, would the old method still exist in the later builds, or be completely deprecated and eventually removed?
That's not possible. When the server does the hit calculations, it has to decide which method to use.ibm5155 wrote: it would be cool if the difference betw the gametics could be saw by a demo recording, if yes I could make both tests on a single demo (and since most of the time i have high ping it would be cool to see it xD)
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
So basically we would get a 2.0 beta build that's to be hosted over any 1.3 server right?Torr Samaho wrote:If the general consensus is that the gametic unlagged in its current state (i.e. changeset 25679f47738ebd391ece37d839641690a442aff2) is simply better than the old ping based unlagged, I'll pull the code into the stable repo, merge it with the 2.0 repo and can make an official 2.0 beta build. Then, servers can host the 2.0 beta and all players that would like to use the new unlagged just need to activate the automatic testing feature in their launcher and can play on these servers without any further hassles. The launcher automatically switches to the correct Zandronum binary when joining the server.Danzoa wrote: So me and Kurt were talking about it, and since the Gametic binary seems to feel pretty much alot more stable when it comes to shooting and registering, we decided to create a topic to ask if it would be possible to create a new version of Zandronum, prior to 2.0 with the system in it.
If that's the case, how about I start a poll about whoever thinks this should be done or not? so that we can already get the newer 2.0 features along with gametic, while you get to work on 2.0 further to perfect bugs that are present? I mean I think we've done enough testing so far to say that the Gametic unlagged really feels ALOT better.

- Torr Samaho
- Lead Developer
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 6:03 pm
- Location: Germany
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
You'll get a 2.0 beta build that can run alongside the normal 1.3 servers with the automatic testing feature. This would also give the 2.0 testing a boast.Danzoa wrote: So basically we would get a 2.0 beta build that's to be hosted over any 1.3 server right?
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
That's interesting, but why not replace 1.3 overall? If the 2.0 beta build is stable and runs well, where would the need for an outdated version be?Torr Samaho wrote:You'll get a 2.0 beta build that can run alongside the normal 1.3 servers with the automatic testing feature. This would also give the 2.0 testing a boast.Danzoa wrote: So basically we would get a 2.0 beta build that's to be hosted over any 1.3 server right?

-
- Frequent Poster Miles card holder
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:58 pm
- Location: Strasbourg, France
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Replacing 1.3 sounds great because 2.0 beta will basically come up with new contents and be better.
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Yeah that's what I think too, so all we need is Torr's approval really, if he wants to put the gametic unlagged into 2.0 and put a beta build up that we could test, and if all is stable and works well, we could make it an official release for now?

- Torr Samaho
- Lead Developer
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 6:03 pm
- Location: Germany
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
No, once we know that 2.0 is sufficiently stable, we'll make a release flagged as stable that completely replaces 1.3.Danzoa wrote: That's interesting, but why not replace 1.3 overall? If the 2.0 beta build is stable and runs well, where would the need for an outdated version be?
Yes, see above. The only thing I need to know from you before I can put the unlagged changes into the official beta builds is whether the current gametic unlagged is good enough in its current state. Especially, it's important to know that you didn't encounter any side effects of the two fixes I had to make recently.Danzoa wrote: Yeah that's what I think too, so all we need is Torr's approval really, if he wants to put the gametic unlagged into 2.0 and put a beta build up that we could test, and if all is stable and works well, we could make it an official release for now?
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Well, to be completely honest, we haven't been noticing any dropped shots, ghost shots etc. except for this one time me and Kurt did, but to be honest that was probably the server acting up, because it's just too coincidential that it happened at the EXACT same time to us both.Torr Samaho wrote:No, once we know that 2.0 is sufficiently stable, we'll make a release flagged as stable that completely replaces 1.3.Danzoa wrote: That's interesting, but why not replace 1.3 overall? If the 2.0 beta build is stable and runs well, where would the need for an outdated version be?
Yes, see above. The only thing I need to know from you before I can put the unlagged changes into the official beta builds is whether the current gametic unlagged is good enough in its current state. Especially, it's important to know that you didn't encounter any side effects of the two fixes I had to make recently.Danzoa wrote: Yeah that's what I think too, so all we need is Torr's approval really, if he wants to put the gametic unlagged into 2.0 and put a beta build up that we could test, and if all is stable and works well, we could make it an official release for now?
I'd say at the moment, it's stable and good enough to put into a 2.0 beta build, if any people encounter issues with it, they can still use ping unlagged so no harm will be done.
And while the Beta is out being tested etc, maybe we'll get some duel, ctf and dm servers up and running wich will be tested on a daily basis, wich is ofcourse, if people want to benefit from a better unlagged system and test it out as much as possible to get it released in a full 2.0 version.
For example we could host the next Friday Night Fragfest with this beta build? That'd be a good test for it since those servers usually get filled with atleast over 20+ people.

-
- Frequent Poster Miles card holder
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:58 pm
- Location: Strasbourg, France
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Imo, next events, such as FNF or TNLMS (or at least CTF/TDM-related stuff) should be hosted with the current beta build, because we barely get more than 7 players to 1.4 testing.
Some say they prefer to wait for the final release of 1.4 (again we must know whether it'll be the case or not...) and some are just too lazy.
Some say they prefer to wait for the final release of 1.4 (again we must know whether it'll be the case or not...) and some are just too lazy.
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
I agree with this and actually I already suggested it in #zatesting.Kara Kurt wrote: Imo, next events, such as FNF or TNLMS (or at least CTF/TDM-related stuff) should be hosted with the current beta build
I think we need to ask FNF team members.
[spoiler][/spoiler]
Code: Select all
<@WaTaKiD> punish me
* Seanphone gets his belt out
<+Seanphone> all right WaTaKiD bend over
Code: Select all
<Kokiri> capo whos your fav pony?
<capo> i like them all
Code: Select all
cobalt changes topic to 'ZDoom 2.6.1 progress: at r3771, 23 revisions left (98% complete)'
<edward-san> omg
<edward-san> almost finished!!!
<Sean> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
<Sean> Plot twist: This is the status of Half-Life 3.
<Dusk> plot twist: the percentage count suddenly begins to decline instead
<Sean> Torr makes a forum post "We're going back to 2.5.0"
<Dusk> and we do so incrementally
- Combinebobnt
- Retired Staff / Community Team Member
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:37 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
RE: Zandronum + the new gametic (Different discussion)
Past experience has shown that fnfs running beta builds usually flop and are headache to deal with.