could someone explain IDE and Doomseeker in detail for me?

[Neo]

Just as the title says I'd like to know the difference of these server browsers in detail.

[Kara Kurt]

Doom Explorer is the new IDE.

http://doomutils.ucoz.com/

[Sean]

Doom Explorer

• Used to be IDE.
• Windows only.
• Ugly. The UI has barely changed since its first releases (but DE brings themes, which kinda fixes it... but the icons are eugh).

Doomseeker

• Cross-platform: works on Windows, Linux, and OS X.
• Open source: anyone can contribute.
• Plugin based: it can be extended to support more game engines, not just Zandronum
• More modern UI.

That's all I can think of off the top of my head.

[Neo]

Doom Explorer

• Used to be IDE.
• Windows only.
• Ugly. The UI has barely changed since its first releases (but DE brings themes, which kinda fixes it... but the icons are eugh).

Doomseeker

• Cross-platform: works on Windows, Linux, and OS X.
• Open source: anyone can contribute.
• Plugin based: it can be extended to support more game engines, not just Zandronum
• More modern UI.

That's all I can think of off the top of my head.

Very good description thanks sean.

[bond]

Doom Explorer

• Used to be IDE.
• Windows only.
• Ugly. The UI has barely changed since its first releases (but DE brings themes, which kinda fixes it... but the icons are eugh).

"IDE in detail..."
cool

[Combinebobnt]

Use master |-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-Doom Explorer-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-| if you are on windows. If you aren't on windows, use the other thing.

[Konar6]

Personal preference plays a big role. I prefer IDE's looks and feature set. It also embeds a very capable IRC client (ZRC). Doomseeker has been slowly catching up though.

[ibm5155]

Doomseker is also heavier compared to ide because it runs with Qt framework.